2001
DOI: 10.1007/s11745-001-0705-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio and density functional theory studies for the explanation of the antioxidant activity of certain phenolic acids

Abstract: Ab initio and density functional theory molecular orbital calculations were carried out at both the HF/6-31 +G(d) and B3LYP/6-31+G(d) levels for the four antioxidants, p-hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives, namely, the p-coumaric, caffeic, ferulic, and sinapinic acid and the corresponding radicals, in an attempt to explain the structural dependency of the antioxidant activity of these compounds. Optimized resulting geometries, vibrational frequencies, absolute infrared intensities, and electron-donating ability a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
64
0
18

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
13
64
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…These structural parameters do not deviate much from the X-ray values found in the literature for caffeic acid [36] (although comparison between results in the solid and in the gas phase must be done with care). Moreover, the values presently obtained for the most stable conformer, CA 1, are in very good accordance with the ones reported by Bakalbassis et al, for the only ground-state geometry calculated by these authors for caffeic acid, at both the HF/6-31 þ G* and B3LYP/6-31 þ G* levels [18]. Potential-energy profiles for internal rotation around different bonds within the caffeic acid molecule -O 7 -C 6 and O 8 -C 5 , C 3 -C 9 , C 10 -C 11 , and C 11 -O 13 -were obtained, along with the respective rotational energy barriers, by scanning the corresponding torsional angles.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These structural parameters do not deviate much from the X-ray values found in the literature for caffeic acid [36] (although comparison between results in the solid and in the gas phase must be done with care). Moreover, the values presently obtained for the most stable conformer, CA 1, are in very good accordance with the ones reported by Bakalbassis et al, for the only ground-state geometry calculated by these authors for caffeic acid, at both the HF/6-31 þ G* and B3LYP/6-31 þ G* levels [18]. Potential-energy profiles for internal rotation around different bonds within the caffeic acid molecule -O 7 -C 6 and O 8 -C 5 , C 3 -C 9 , C 10 -C 11 , and C 11 -O 13 -were obtained, along with the respective rotational energy barriers, by scanning the corresponding torsional angles.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The vibrational spectrum was calculated for all conformers found for caffeic acid (data available from the authors upon request). The calculated wavenumbers for the most stable geometries -CA 1, CA 2 and CA 3 -are comprised in Table 2, along with the corresponding assignment, and show a good overall accordance with the theoretical values reported by Bakalbassis et al, for CA 1 [18]. Also, the agreement between the presently calculated frequencies, using the scaling factors proposed by Scott and Radom [33], and the Raman experimental data found in the literature for this molecule [37 -39] was found to be quite good.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, comparing the theoretical coupling constants of the neutral and dissociated catechol radicals (the carboxyl group is always considered dissociated), the participation of the excess electron from the phenolate group obviously enhances the overall resonance stabilization (data not shown). Since application of this theoretical approach for more complex structures is still in its infancy, the only comparable studies were carried out for the calculations of the spin densities of three undissociated semiquinone structures of caffeic acid (34) and calculations of bond-dissociation energies of phenolic protons (35,36).…”
Section: Gmentioning
confidence: 99%