2008
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/180/1/102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AEGIS-X: THE CHANDRA DEEP SURVEY OF THE EXTENDED GROTH STRIP

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
321
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(329 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
8
321
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the EGS field we also identify two distinct surveys: 1) the series of eight pointings that reach a nominal depth of ∼200ks and were presented in Laird et al (2009), which we refer to as the AEGIS-XW(ide) survey; and 2) the AEGIS-XD(eep) survey (Nandra et al 2015) which took three of the original 200ks to a depth of ∼ 800ks. We adopt the deeper AEGIS-XD observations when available.…”
Section: Chandra X-ray Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the EGS field we also identify two distinct surveys: 1) the series of eight pointings that reach a nominal depth of ∼200ks and were presented in Laird et al (2009), which we refer to as the AEGIS-XW(ide) survey; and 2) the AEGIS-XD(eep) survey (Nandra et al 2015) which took three of the original 200ks to a depth of ∼ 800ks. We adopt the deeper AEGIS-XD observations when available.…”
Section: Chandra X-ray Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The X-ray data from all of our surveys were reduced with our own pipeline procedure, which is described in detail by Laird et al (2009) and Nandra et al (2015). We performed point source detection using the procedure described by Laird et al (2009) and applied a false Poisson probability threshold of < 4 × 10 −6 to generate catalogues of detected sources in the soft (0.5-2 keV), hard (2-7 keV), full (0.5-7 keV) or ultrahard (4-7 keV) observed energy bands.…”
Section: Chandra X-ray Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We match the NIR-selected catalogues with X-ray detected sources in the Chandra imaging of our fields (Alexander et al 2003;Xue et al 2011;Nandra et al 2015;Civano et al 2016), where all the Chandra data have been reprocessed using our own procedures (see Laird et al 2009;Georgakakis et al 2014;Nandra et al 2015;Aird et al 2015). We also extract X-ray data (total counts, background counts, and effective exposures) at the positions of the remaining NIR-selected sources that are not matched to a significant X-ray detection, We extract counts within a circular aperture that corresponds to a 70 per cent enclosed energy fraction for the exposure-weighted Chandra point spread function at each source position.…”
Section: Data and Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MLE takes into account the distance between an X-ray source and ancillary objects within the search radius, the astrometric errors of the X-ray and ancillary sources, and the magnitude distribution of ancillary sources in the background to determine whether a potential multi-wavelength counterpart is more likely to be a background source or a true match. This method has been implemented in many X-ray surveys to identify reliable counterparts (e.g., Brusa et al 2007Brusa et al , 2010Cardamone et al 2008;Laird et al 2009;Luo et al 2010;Civano et al 2012;LaMassa et al 2013a;Marchesi et al 2015).…”
Section: Multi-wavelength Catalog Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%