Religious education (RE) is arguably one of the most legislated curriculum areas anywhere in the world, and yet in countries where legislation and educational policy exist to support its provision, how schools implement the subject in practice has not received much attention in the discourse. This article attempts to address this lacuna by analyzing the disjuncture between legislative policy and school practice in RE as it exists in Scottish non-denominational schools. The discussion offers possible explanations suggesting that this has to do more with the flexibility of the Scottish curriculum through the use of "open" national guidelines, and the relative autonomy schools have within the educational system. What is problematized in this article is that mismatches between policy and practice in Scottish RE are symptomatic of the complexity of interpreting and applying legislative policy in a contested school subject. This article highlights the increased contradictions and confusions of differential teacher and school experiences of and responses to legislative policy that govern Scottish religious education (RE), a contested and controversial subject (Matemba 2013b, 7ff), existing in an educational system where schools have increased autonomy regarding how the curriculum is delivered in practice (Teelken 1999, 289). Although this article is concerned with policy-practice issues in Scottish non-denominational schools, it is hoped that the discussion will inform the debate not only in the wider Scottish educational context but contribute to RE discourse in the rest of the United Kingdom and beyond. Informed by Stephen Balls' idea of policy as "discourse" (1997), I theorize on how non-denominational schools engage with legislative policy that govern Scottish RE in light of a recent government report ("Teaching Scotland's Future"), which has decried teachers' professional standards and called for an effective professional development regime for teachers as a way, inter alia, of minimizing the
Religious Education