The costs of superconducting magnet strands are compared by calculating a ‘production scaling factor’
P
that relates purchase data to the cost of raw materials. Using a consistent method, we
normalize for different conductor geometries and strand diameters to arrive at cost indices in
$ kg−1,
$ m−1,
and $ kA−1 m−1. Analyses of Nb47Ti conductors taken from the past 25 years of high-field magnet projects
reveal that the price of raw materials and, to a lesser extent, finished strands, have tracked
the price of niobium pentoxide. Performance gains during the 1980s produced
$ kA−1 m−1
indices that fell with time ahead of strand cost in
$ m−1, a situation that may reflect the present status of
Nb3Sn
magnet conductors. Analyses of present materials show that
P
decreases systematically with billet mass. While production strands in 200–500 kg billets
have costs times the cost of raw materials, the 20–50 kg billet size for internal-tin
Nb3Sn composites
drives P
up to 8–10. Thus, in contrast to LHC-type Nb47Ti strands that cost
$150 kg−1,
$0.60 m−1, and
$1.00 kA−1 m−1 at 5 T,
4.2 K, Nb3Sn
strands required for the next generation of accelerator magnets are
$1000 kg−1,
$4.00 m−1, and
>$5.75 kA−1 m−1 at 12 T,
4.2 K (where Jc
is comparable to that for Nb47Ti at 5 T, 4.2 K). This high cost might be reduced by a factor
of if a large-scale internal-tin or powder-in-tube
Nb3Sn
process can be found. Replacing expensive components with functionally
equivalent but cheaper materials can produce 20% changes in
$ kg−1
and $ m−1, but this might come at a performance penalty and no net savings in
$ kA−1 m−1. Removing stabilizer from the strand cross-section and replacing it elsewhere in
the cable can reduce the cost for a given length of cable significantly, but
only if the processing cost for the strand remains unchanged after reduction
of the stabilizer area. Emerging powder-in-tube composites show promise:
Nb3Sn strands
could reach $6 kA−1 m−1
at 12 T, 4.2 K, while Bi-2212 strands could fall below
$10 m−1.
MgB2
superconducting strands could have very low raw materials cost at
$0.20 m−1, which
translates to $1.00 m−1
for finished strands and at 2 T, 4.2 K based on published data.