1964
DOI: 10.1002/sce.3730480211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Andreas osiander: Lover of science or appeaser of its enemies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense Osiander was included by Pierre Duhem into the movement of the "savers of phenomena" (Duhem 1969). At the same time, Duhem also considers Osiander's approach as being common in modern science (Gingerich 1973;Graubard 1964). Concerning the philosophy of science, Osiander's initial role in the birth of instrumentalism was emphasized by Karl Raimund Popper, who advocates realism and considers instrumentalism as a dogma stemming from Osiander, Bellarmin, and George Berkeley (Popper 1965).…”
Section: Legacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense Osiander was included by Pierre Duhem into the movement of the "savers of phenomena" (Duhem 1969). At the same time, Duhem also considers Osiander's approach as being common in modern science (Gingerich 1973;Graubard 1964). Concerning the philosophy of science, Osiander's initial role in the birth of instrumentalism was emphasized by Karl Raimund Popper, who advocates realism and considers instrumentalism as a dogma stemming from Osiander, Bellarmin, and George Berkeley (Popper 1965).…”
Section: Legacymentioning
confidence: 99%