“…Certainly A. afarensis would have been a more capable climber than are humans, but without key morphologies such as a grasping big toe, their ability to move about easily in the trees, particularly for females holding infants, would have been severely compromised compared with apes (see Ward, 2002, 2013a,b andreferences therein). If A. afarensis was a less efficient bipedal walker than are humans, it would have been simply that they had shorter lower limbs, bulkier upper bodies, and a smaller body size, but not different limb or joint postures during walking or running (see also Hammond and Ward, 2013). It has also been argued that certain aspects of their anatomy that differ from those of humans, including widely splayed iliac blades, large navicular tuberosity in the foot, and long pedal phalanges, would have made bipedal walking less efficient than and kinematically distinct from that of humans.…”