2019
DOI: 10.1109/lcsys.2018.2866903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BDC-Decomposition for Global Influence Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system is also shown to be a candidate oscillator [5], [6], consistently with glycolytic oscillations reported in the literature, not only for yeast [2], [11], but also for E. coli [22], [23], [31] and even for human pancreatic beta-cells [33]. The steady-state influences among the system variables (i.e., the variations in the steady state of a variable due to a persistent positive perturbation added to the differential equation of another variable) are also assessed [9], [14], [15], to reveal influences whose sign is preserved regardless of the parameters, and to analyse sensitivity to parameter variations; it turns out that the variation of [AT P ] due to additive perturbations affecting the other metabolites is particularly small, which supports the evidence of energy homeostasis (Section III). Finally, the theoretical predictions obtained with the proposed model are compared to experimental observations from E. coli cultivations: the model is able to reproduce very well the qualitative evolution of concentrations over time, and the observed energy homeostasis (Section IV).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The system is also shown to be a candidate oscillator [5], [6], consistently with glycolytic oscillations reported in the literature, not only for yeast [2], [11], but also for E. coli [22], [23], [31] and even for human pancreatic beta-cells [33]. The steady-state influences among the system variables (i.e., the variations in the steady state of a variable due to a persistent positive perturbation added to the differential equation of another variable) are also assessed [9], [14], [15], to reveal influences whose sign is preserved regardless of the parameters, and to analyse sensitivity to parameter variations; it turns out that the variation of [AT P ] due to additive perturbations affecting the other metabolites is particularly small, which supports the evidence of energy homeostasis (Section III). Finally, the theoretical predictions obtained with the proposed model are compared to experimental observations from E. coli cultivations: the model is able to reproduce very well the qualitative evolution of concentrations over time, and the observed energy homeostasis (Section IV).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Assumption 2: In the system in Table I, D = µ = 0. If D = µ = 0, the system admits a BDC-decomposition [4], [7], [8], [9], [14]: Then, the steady state can be proven to be unique. Proposition 2: Under Assumptions 1 and 2, the system in Table I admits a unique steady statex ∈ B, which does not have zero components.…”
Section: B Uniqueness Of the Steady Statementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following proposition provides a necessary and sufficient condition for the steady state (14) to be well defined. Proposition 4 (Existence of a steady state): A is robustly nonsingular, namely det(A) = 0 for all A ∈ A, if and only if det(A) has the same sign on all the vertices of A.…”
Section: Static Linear Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition 5 (Positivity of the steady state): The steady statex defined in (14) is positive for all A ∈ A if and only if −A −1 b > 0 for all the vertices of A.…”
Section: Static Linear Casementioning
confidence: 99%