2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583)
DOI: 10.1109/icsmc.2004.1400764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"I call shotgun!": an evaluation of mixed-initiative control for novice users of a search and rescue robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much of the published experimental work does not carefully control for possible confounding factors. These factors can vary from partially uncontrolled test environments (as in [10]), up to the absence of standardized training for human test-subjects as in [8], [11], [12]. It is particularly important to control for the training and experience of human test-subjects, as these factors are known to affect overall robot operating performance [13], [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the published experimental work does not carefully control for possible confounding factors. These factors can vary from partially uncontrolled test environments (as in [10]), up to the absence of standardized training for human test-subjects as in [8], [11], [12]. It is particularly important to control for the training and experience of human test-subjects, as these factors are known to affect overall robot operating performance [13], [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work on mixed initiative interactions has primarily focused on the development of effective graphical user interfaces or haptic feedback to relay task-dependent data to the human, and to relay human control information to the automatic controller or autonomous, robotic agent (e.g., [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]). In this paper, we largely ignore this issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that the participants in this study represent a random sampling of the population. In any case, a previous study with our control architecture indicates that there are no statistically significant effects for age or gender pertaining to users of our system [14].…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In contrast to our previous experiments [7,14] which were designed to determine the benefits of different levels of robot initiative, this experiment focused on a quantitative analysis of performance, workload, error, and feeling of control collected during the exploration task. Based on our previous experiment with novice users [14] it was assumed no statistical performance differences exist across age or gender differences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%