2021
DOI: 10.1145/3432947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"I can't get round"

Abstract: Via audiovisual communications and a controllable physical embodiment, Mobile Robotic telePresence (MRP) systems aim to support enhanced collaboration between remote and local members of a given setting. But MRP systems also put the remote user in positions where they frequently rely on the help of local partners. Getting or 'recruiting' such help can be done with various verbal and embodied actions ranging in explicitness. In this paper, we look at how such recruitment occurs in video data drawn from an exper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consumers can be creative with how they use technology to engage in social interactions. In the context of mobile telepresence robots (MTRs), Boudouraki et al ( 75 ) posit that it is sufficient for the person operating the MTR to have the “ability to participate and successfully ‘gear into' everyday social interaction, vs. the academic stance of simulating high fidelity presence. In our own MTR research ( 76 ), we found that during a 7-month deployment in which Older Adults had a robot in their home, their self-reported highlights included playing hide “n” seek and entering the dining room during a dinner and surprising her family.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumers can be creative with how they use technology to engage in social interactions. In the context of mobile telepresence robots (MTRs), Boudouraki et al ( 75 ) posit that it is sufficient for the person operating the MTR to have the “ability to participate and successfully ‘gear into' everyday social interaction, vs. the academic stance of simulating high fidelity presence. In our own MTR research ( 76 ), we found that during a 7-month deployment in which Older Adults had a robot in their home, their self-reported highlights included playing hide “n” seek and entering the dining room during a dinner and surprising her family.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the autonomous behaviour of the robot is not easily interpreted by users due to lack of display capabilities to make it apparent to both the local and remote users what the MRP is doing from moment-to-moment. Therefore, remote users frequently rely on co-present people to provide assistance with navigation, object handling, and even hearing and seeing (e.g., reading text) in the local environment [12]. Contrasting views from remote users about relying on local users' assistance have been reported; some people have expressed disliking feeling helpless and others embraced the MRP system constraints [24].…”
Section: Motivation and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we also created a short video (around 5 minutes) with instructions on effective use. This covered some of the social implications of using a robot that have been flagged by existing literature (e.g., how the perspectives of the on-site and remote users differ and that on-site users should not treat the remote user as an object) [1,5,14,21,30]. The video also provided some suggestions for effective use (e.g., taking turns in talk, asking for help), and asked employees to always dock the robots between uses.…”
Section: Information On Usementioning
confidence: 99%