Bergey's Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria 2018
DOI: 10.1002/9781118960608.gbm01259.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CandidatusPhytoplasma

Abstract: Phy.to.plas'ma. Gr. neut. n. phyton , a plant; Gr. neut. n. plasma something formed or molded, a form; N.L. neut. n. Phytoplasma , a form from a plant. Tenericutes / Mollicutes / Acholeplasmatales / Incertae Sedis ‐ Family II / Candidatus Phytoplasma The generic name ‘ Candidatus Phytoplasma’ has been adopted by specialists t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 252 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For phytoplasmas, the classification follows the rules established by the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (Parker et al 2015) and additional criteria established by the Phytoplasma/Spiroplasma Working Team (IRPCM, Phytoplasma/Spiroplasma Working Team - Phytoplasma Taxonomy Group 2004, Harrison et al 2018). All phytoplasma strains in the database are listed as Incertae sedis and they are classified into groups and subgroups defined based on restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-amplified 16S rRNA gene fragments (Zhao et al 2010).…”
Section: Taxonomic Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For phytoplasmas, the classification follows the rules established by the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (Parker et al 2015) and additional criteria established by the Phytoplasma/Spiroplasma Working Team (IRPCM, Phytoplasma/Spiroplasma Working Team - Phytoplasma Taxonomy Group 2004, Harrison et al 2018). All phytoplasma strains in the database are listed as Incertae sedis and they are classified into groups and subgroups defined based on restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-amplified 16S rRNA gene fragments (Zhao et al 2010).…”
Section: Taxonomic Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phytoplasmas were observed for the first time in 1967 (Doi et al 1967) and only recently classified based on phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA and ribosomal protein (rp) gene sequences, revealing their diversity and phylogenetic position (Lee et al 2000; IRPCM, Phytoplasma/Spiroplasma Working Team - Phytoplasma Taxonomy Group 2004). To date, 33 groups and more than 120 subgroups have been recognised based on 16Sr genetic data and 44 taxa have been given the provisional taxonomic status of ‘ Candidatus ’ (Harrison et al 2018), denoting not-yet cultured bacteria. As phytoplasmas do not satisfy the four Koch postulates (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%