2005
DOI: 10.1086/430873
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ChandraHETGS Multiphase Spectroscopy of the Young Magnetic O Starθ1Orionis C

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

39
267
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(306 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
39
267
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant roughly sinusoidal shaped rotational modulation would be present if the star partially occults X-ray emitting material depending on rotational phase or when a disk around the star is viewed from different angles. An example are the X-ray brightness variations of the massive magnetic star θ 1 Ori C (Gagné et al 2005). This model assumes cylindrical symmetry for the system as is likely appropriate for a star with a disk and as is commonly observed when, e.g.…”
Section: Source Detections Light Curves and A Flarementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Significant roughly sinusoidal shaped rotational modulation would be present if the star partially occults X-ray emitting material depending on rotational phase or when a disk around the star is viewed from different angles. An example are the X-ray brightness variations of the massive magnetic star θ 1 Ori C (Gagné et al 2005). This model assumes cylindrical symmetry for the system as is likely appropriate for a star with a disk and as is commonly observed when, e.g.…”
Section: Source Detections Light Curves and A Flarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A well studied example is the magnetic O5 star θ 1 Ori C, where Gagné et al (2005) find that the dynamic MCWS model describes the X-ray properties of the star very well. It has an average X-ray luminosity of L X = 1×10 33 erg s −1 and using among other diagnostics f /i-line ratios, they conclude that the X-ray emitting plasma is located at distances of only 0.2 .…”
Section: What About Hotter Magnetic Stars?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-mass young stellar objects (YSOs) have been known as strong hard X-ray emitters due to flares caused by magnetic reconnection ( Feigelson & Montmerle 1999). It has recently been proposed that magnetic activity may be responsible for the hard emission seen in some young O stars (Schulz et al 2003;Gagné et al 2005;Stelzer et al 2005). There is also a possibility that the hard extended emission may be a special case of the wind-blown bubble employed to explain the soft diffuse emission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three stars do not have massive, spectroscopic companions, and their L X is too high to be produced by unseen, lower-mass pre-mainsequence (PMS) companions. For these three we consider two hypotheses: a more distant massive companion (as is the case for HD 93129A), or magnetically confined wind shocks (as in θ 1 Ori C, Gagné et al 2005). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%