2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/6287057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlamydia trachomatis Growth and Cytokine mRNA Response in a Prostate Cancer Cell Line

Abstract: In the present paper, we report that C. trachomatis can be efficiently propagated and affect mRNA expression for two major cytokines, relevant to tumor progression, in CWR-R1 cells, a malignant prostate cell line. CWR-R1 and McCoy cells, a classic cell line for chlamydial research, were grown and infected with C. trachomatis under similar conditions. Cell monolayers were harvested for RNA analysis and immunostaining with major outer membrane protein (MOMP) antibody at 24, 48, and 72 hours of the postinfection … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Human prostate epithelial cells showed a similar progression of chlamydial intracellular developmental cycle as that observed in cervical epithelial cells, alongside a comparable infection efficiency (Petyaev et al, 2019). By contrast, in Sertoli and synovial cells, the duration of the different C. trachomatis developmental stages, as well as the number of infectious EBs released from host cells, greatly differed as compared to those observed in cervical epithelial cells, routinely used for chlamydial research (Filardo et al, 2019b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Human prostate epithelial cells showed a similar progression of chlamydial intracellular developmental cycle as that observed in cervical epithelial cells, alongside a comparable infection efficiency (Petyaev et al, 2019). By contrast, in Sertoli and synovial cells, the duration of the different C. trachomatis developmental stages, as well as the number of infectious EBs released from host cells, greatly differed as compared to those observed in cervical epithelial cells, routinely used for chlamydial research (Filardo et al, 2019b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Important differences were also observed in the immune and inflammatory host cell responses to C. trachomatis infection, with the activation of different molecular sensors, downstream signalling pathways and inflammatory signatures. Indeed, human prostate cells recognition of C. trachomatis by TLR2/ TLR4 induced a pro-inflammatory state, highlighted by increased levels of IL-1b, IL-6, IL-8 and TNFa (Sellami et al, 2014;Petyaev et al, 2019). By contrast, TLR3-mediated sensing of chlamydial infection in human Sertoli cells did not elicit the activation of the related pathways, namely NFkB and IRF3, as well as the subsequent cytokine production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chlamydia trachomatis is an atypical bacterium that can be transmitted sexually. A recent in vitro study showed that Chlamydia trachomatis can proliferate in prostate cancer cells, resulting in enhanced transcription of IL-6 and FGF-2 genes, while FGF-2 can promote vascularization and metastasis of primary prostate cancer (133). In addition, after Chlamydia trachomatis infection, NF-kappa B was activated, TLR2 and TLR4 were significantly up-regulated, which promoted tumor progression (73).…”
Section: Effect Of Sexually Transmitted Pathogens On Prostate Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Chlamydia trachomatis, cultivated within malignant prostate cells line, was found to affect mRNA expression for two major proinflammatory cytokines- IL-6 and FGF-2. They may both account for the mechanism of chemoresistance of prostate cancer, its vascularization, and, thus, the formation of metastatic lesions [ 46 ]. Just as promising as these results seem, prospective studies, avoiding self-reported assessments, should be held in order to reduce bias and underestimation of exposure.…”
Section: Exogenous Microbial Factors—is Stds’ Role Important?mentioning
confidence: 99%