2017
DOI: 10.1261/rna.062224.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cis-regulatory elements explain most of the mRNA stability variation across genes in yeast

Abstract: The stability of mRNA is one of the major determinants of gene expression. Although a wealth of sequence elements regulating mRNA stability has been described, their quantitative contributions to half-life are unknown. Here, we built a quantitative model for Saccharomyces cerevisiae based on functional mRNA sequence features that explains 59% of the half-life variation between genes and predicts half-life at a median relative error of 30%. The model revealed a new destabilizing 3 ′ ′ ′ ′ ′ UTR motif, ATATTC, w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
96
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(103 reference statements)
15
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, between the 25th and 75th percentile of mRNA stability, there was a 3.2-fold difference in stability and between the top and bottom 1% of mRNA stability there was over a 64-fold difference ( Figure 2A ). To identify features that explain the range of mRNA stabilities observed, we performed multiple linear regression taking into account the following features that previous studies implicated in affecting mRNA stability: 3’ UTR length, 5’ UTR length, CDS length, 3’ UTR GC content, 5’ UTR GC content, CDS GC content, AU-rich elements (ARE), miRNA-binding sites, number of exons in the transcript, and upstream ORFs ( Chan and Mugler, 2017 ; Cheng et al, 2017 ; Sharova et al, 2009 ). Combined, these features explained 25% of the variation in mRNA stability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, between the 25th and 75th percentile of mRNA stability, there was a 3.2-fold difference in stability and between the top and bottom 1% of mRNA stability there was over a 64-fold difference ( Figure 2A ). To identify features that explain the range of mRNA stabilities observed, we performed multiple linear regression taking into account the following features that previous studies implicated in affecting mRNA stability: 3’ UTR length, 5’ UTR length, CDS length, 3’ UTR GC content, 5’ UTR GC content, CDS GC content, AU-rich elements (ARE), miRNA-binding sites, number of exons in the transcript, and upstream ORFs ( Chan and Mugler, 2017 ; Cheng et al, 2017 ; Sharova et al, 2009 ). Combined, these features explained 25% of the variation in mRNA stability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mammalian mRNAs display a wide range of half-lives ranging from minutes to over a day ( Schwanhäusser et al, 2011 ). The wide range of mRNA stabilities are regulated by both intrinsic sequence features as well as the binding of regulatory factors such as microRNAs and RNA-binding proteins ( Cheng et al, 2017 ; Hasan et al, 2014 ; Wu and Brewer, 2012 ). However, the identity and how such features and regulatory factors impact mRNA stability are not well understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the CHS 5′UTR with the LPH leader peptide was associated with the highest DsRed mRNA levels for both promoters, and the decline in expression post‐infiltration was delayed (Figure B for 35SS and FigureJ for nos ). Differences in the GC‐content, coding sequence and 5′UTR length as well as folding energy of the mRNA may be responsible for this outcome . For example, the folding energy of the TL 5′UTR is about −180 kJ mol −1 compared to approximately −75 kJ mol −1 for the others .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targeted deadenylation occurs when proteins bound to specific mRNA sequences recruit the Ccr4-Not complex ( Goldstrohm et al., 2006 , Stowell et al., 2016 , Wahle and Winkler, 2013 ). The action of these mRNA-binding proteins does not, however, fully account for the wide range of half-lives observed across the eukaryotic transcriptome ( Cheng et al., 2017 ). An additional major determinant of mRNA decay is the rate of translation elongation, and this correlates with codon optimality ( Presnyak et al., 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%