1963
DOI: 10.1056/nejm196308292690909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clostridium tertiumSepticemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…tertium is different from other Clostridium species because it can be cultured under aerobic conditions. [4] Because of the fact that C. tertium is observed as both gram-positive and -negative bacilli, it can be misidentified as Corynebacterium or Bacillus species; thus, it usually takes considerable time to identify the species using classical bacteriological techniques. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Hence, in our case, we initially misidentified C. tertium as L. grayi.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…tertium is different from other Clostridium species because it can be cultured under aerobic conditions. [4] Because of the fact that C. tertium is observed as both gram-positive and -negative bacilli, it can be misidentified as Corynebacterium or Bacillus species; thus, it usually takes considerable time to identify the species using classical bacteriological techniques. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Hence, in our case, we initially misidentified C. tertium as L. grayi.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, although most documented cases have involved neutropenic patients, [2,[5][6][7][9][10][11] cases involving non-neutropenic patients have also been described. [2,4,7,8] Salvador et al [11] reported that C. tertium could be rapidly identified using a novel mass spectrometry technology (matrix assisted laser desorption ionization timeof-flight). In this case, we believe that C. tertium was the cause of septicemia because the organism was independently cultured and that the bacterium identified in the anal wound cultures was different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations