A consensus is emerging in both scientific circles and international policy discourse that business-as-usual approaches to sustainability have led to a critical state, and that urgent measures are required to reverse these dynamics. At the same time, national and international commitments to address the crisis remain reluctant to reconsider the assumption that growth can continue unchecked (Alexander 2012; Gough 2017; Adloff and Neckel 2019). Indeed, in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the argument is even made that growth should be encouraged to provide the necessary resources for implementing the goals, and efforts for sustainability in higher education seldom question that paradigm (Ruiz-Mallén and Heras 2020).In recent decades, we have seen that growth, as such, does not address inequity within or across states, and instead tends to reinforce an extractivist model that concentrates control over resources and key technologies in a small number of hands (Acosta 2013). Technological advances have not offset environmental impacts and emissions continue to rise. Climate change and other environmental impacts continue to disproportionately affect the poorest, destroying the basis of their livelihoods. Both armed conflicts and economic warfare, aimed at control over water, minerals and hydrocarbons, drive internal displacement and forced migration, increasing the number of people worldwide that no state is willing to take responsibility for. It