1999
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conus Peptides Targeted to Specific Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Subtypes

Abstract: The venoms of predatory cone snails represent a rich combinatorial-like library of evolutionarily selected, neuropharmacologically active peptides. A major fraction of the venom components are conotoxins--small, disulfide-rich peptides that potently and specifically target components of the neuromuscular system, particularly ligand- and voltage-gated ion channels. This review focuses on Conus peptides, which act at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. These nicotinic antagonist peptides from Conus are broadly di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
280
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 293 publications
(287 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
4
280
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Vc1.1 and RgIA are both potent antagonists of α9α10 nAChRs, suggesting this may be the anti-allodynia target (Vincler et al 2006). However, MII and AuIB are both devoid of activity at α9α10 nAChRs (McIntosh et al 1999;Callaghan et al 2008;Azam and McIntosh 2009;Callaghan and Adams 2010;Klimis et al 2011) and other -conotoxin analogues that act on these nAChRs fail to inhibit allodynia (Nevin et al 2007). Moreover, 910 nAChRs show very limited tissue distribution, being expressed predominantly in the olivochochlear system (Vetter et al, 2007) and their role in sensory nerve function is unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vc1.1 and RgIA are both potent antagonists of α9α10 nAChRs, suggesting this may be the anti-allodynia target (Vincler et al 2006). However, MII and AuIB are both devoid of activity at α9α10 nAChRs (McIntosh et al 1999;Callaghan et al 2008;Azam and McIntosh 2009;Callaghan and Adams 2010;Klimis et al 2011) and other -conotoxin analogues that act on these nAChRs fail to inhibit allodynia (Nevin et al 2007). Moreover, 910 nAChRs show very limited tissue distribution, being expressed predominantly in the olivochochlear system (Vetter et al, 2007) and their role in sensory nerve function is unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These groups have different degrees of antagonistic effect on distinct nAChRs. The α4/7 subfamily, as well as the α4/3 and α4/4 subfamilies, targets neuronal nAChRs with one exception of α-EI [24,31]. Such a characteristic of the α4/7 subfamily differs from that of the α3/5 subfamily that mostly blocks neuromuscular α1β1γδ subtypes [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, we have examined several members of the large family of conus snail toxins for selectivity to the Lymnaea, Aplysia and Bulinus binding proteins [11,[19][20][21]. Many toxins also show considerable selectivity for the three binding proteins (Table I) [22,23].…”
Section: Structural Determinants Of Specificitymentioning
confidence: 99%