2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.08.12.503759
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytocipherdetermines significantly different populations of cells in single cell RNA-seq data

Abstract: Identification of novel and known cell types with single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) is revolutionising the study of multicellular organisms. However, typical scRNA-seq analysis involves many preprocessing steps and represents an abstraction of the original measurements, often resulting in clusters of single cells that may not display distinct gene expression. To mitigate this, cell clusters are typically validated as cell types by re-examination of the original expression measurements, often resulting in post-ho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, using published cell type annotations as a stand-in for ground truth cell identities risks biasing benchmarking results in favor of methods similar to those used in the original analysis. We therefore used complementary strategies in a three-tiered benchmarking approach to comprehensively compare the performance of CHOIR with that of 14 other unsupervised clustering methods 5,6,9,10,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] (Supplementary Table 3) in the analysis of both simulated and real data (Supplementary Fig. 1c and Supplementary Table 1).…”
Section: Benchmarking Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, using published cell type annotations as a stand-in for ground truth cell identities risks biasing benchmarking results in favor of methods similar to those used in the original analysis. We therefore used complementary strategies in a three-tiered benchmarking approach to comprehensively compare the performance of CHOIR with that of 14 other unsupervised clustering methods 5,6,9,10,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] (Supplementary Table 3) in the analysis of both simulated and real data (Supplementary Fig. 1c and Supplementary Table 1).…”
Section: Benchmarking Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%