1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1995.tb04118.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

De novo balanced 5;21 translocation in a child with acrobrachycephaly, ventriculomegaly, pulmonary stenosis, ectopic anus and mental retardation

Abstract: An apparently balanced de novo reciprocal translocation t(5;21) (q13;q22) was demonstrated in a girl with acrobrachycephaly, ventriculomegaly, pulmonary stenosis and anal malformation. The possible relationships between her karyotype and malformations are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Characteristics of the present and previously described patients with dup5q and craniostenosis were compared in Table I. A further patient presenting acrobrachycephaly (very likely due to primary craniostenosis) was described in association with a “de novo” apparently balanced reciprocal translocation t(5;21)(q13;q22) [Hordnes et al, 1995]. However, in this case, the breakpoint in the long arm of chromosome 5 was too distant from the MSX2 locus and this evidence moved against the direct involvement of this gene by cryptic duplication or position effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characteristics of the present and previously described patients with dup5q and craniostenosis were compared in Table I. A further patient presenting acrobrachycephaly (very likely due to primary craniostenosis) was described in association with a “de novo” apparently balanced reciprocal translocation t(5;21)(q13;q22) [Hordnes et al, 1995]. However, in this case, the breakpoint in the long arm of chromosome 5 was too distant from the MSX2 locus and this evidence moved against the direct involvement of this gene by cryptic duplication or position effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%