2014
DOI: 10.1177/0092055x14554879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“I Did Not Miss Any, Only When I Had a Valid Reason”

Abstract: ArticleStudent attendance is a curious issue. On the one hand there is a clear message in the pedagogical literature that for learning to take place the most important student behavior is attending class (Howard 2005;Prince 2004). Chickering and Gamson (1987:2) argue that regular contact between students and their teachers is "the most important factor in student motivation and involvement" and also characterize good learning as a "collaborative and social" process, rather than something that individual stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first point is to avoid the reliance on one-time cross-sectional assessments, based on a single module, subject or programme of study (Azab et al, 2016;Bati et al, 2013;Massingham & Herrington, 2006), isolating a minimum unit of time from a broader context and not taking into account the development of the complete course. The second point is that with a total 694 students and records on 4,043 subjects we overcome the use of small student samples (Cortright et al, 2011;Kelly, 2012;2016;O'Sullivan et al, 2015;) which may generate a bias of sample size, conditioning in some cases the generalization of the results. Third, using recorded behavioural data, instead of self-reported data to measure attendance, avoids the discrepancies between self-reported data and actual data in the assessment of absenteeism and performance (Barrett et al, 2007;Kelly, 2012) and the serious threat regarding validity, memory bias and social desirability (Porter, 2011;Standish & Umbach, 2019), although this limitation has been overcome in previous studies using electronic attendance measures (Newman-Ford et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first point is to avoid the reliance on one-time cross-sectional assessments, based on a single module, subject or programme of study (Azab et al, 2016;Bati et al, 2013;Massingham & Herrington, 2006), isolating a minimum unit of time from a broader context and not taking into account the development of the complete course. The second point is that with a total 694 students and records on 4,043 subjects we overcome the use of small student samples (Cortright et al, 2011;Kelly, 2012;2016;O'Sullivan et al, 2015;) which may generate a bias of sample size, conditioning in some cases the generalization of the results. Third, using recorded behavioural data, instead of self-reported data to measure attendance, avoids the discrepancies between self-reported data and actual data in the assessment of absenteeism and performance (Barrett et al, 2007;Kelly, 2012) and the serious threat regarding validity, memory bias and social desirability (Porter, 2011;Standish & Umbach, 2019), although this limitation has been overcome in previous studies using electronic attendance measures (Newman-Ford et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, at one BtB session in which I administered a SET, all 36 of the registered students were present, an unusual occurrence before I used BtB. It may be that because BtB shares with other pedagogies a local norming effect, it may overcome traditional barriers to attendance (O'Sullivan et al 2015).…”
Section: Indications Of Successmentioning
confidence: 99%