“…There are few in-built restrictions around data collection methods or sources in reflexive TA research. A wide range of data sources has been used in published TA research, including everything from more conventional and extensively used methods such as interviews (e.g., Robinson-Wood et al, 2020) and focus groups (e.g., Tebbe et al, 2018), to other self-report techniques such as open-ended/qualitative survey responses (e.g., Blackie et al, 2020) and solicited diaries (e.g., Schnur et al, 2009). From innovative and creative methods such as story completion (e.g., Jennings et al, 2019) and visual methods (e.g., Devine-Wright & Devine-Wright, 2009), with forms of reflexive TA specifically developed for the analysis of imagery (e.g., Gleeson, 2011), to "naturalistic" and preexisting data sources such as psychotherapy sessions (e.g., Willcox et al, 2019), online forum posts (e.g., Fletcher & StGeorge, 2011), and political speeches (e.g., Pilecki, 2017).…”