2021
DOI: 10.1080/10758216.2021.1914111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

I Don’t Like It Unless It’s for Me: Voters’ Perceptions of Pork-Barrel Politics in Central and Eastern Europe

Abstract: Public resources are often allocated neither effectively nor equitably, and they serve as a tool for securing reelection. Despite compelling evidence for pork-barrel politics, little is known about voters' perceptions of this practice. Moreover, limited findings from Western countries are also contradictory -voters perceive such a strategy both positively and negatively. To contribute with findings from Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), we conducted two survey experiments -in Czechia and Slovakia -which random… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, the study of clientelism has gradually expanded and many recent analyses explore the consequences of clientelism. They often go in two directions: some studies investigate individuals in order to understand how clientelistic practices shape attitudes and behaviors, while other works focus on institutions and societies (Kitschelt and Wilkinson, 2007;Stokes et al, 2013;Braidwood, 2015;Bøggild, 2016;Bøggild and Laustsen, 2016;Corstange, 2018;Nichter, 2018;Nemčok et al, 2020;Tóth, Nemčok and Spáč, 2020;Gherghina, Saikkonen and Bankov, 2021).…”
Section: Studying Electoral Clientelismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, the study of clientelism has gradually expanded and many recent analyses explore the consequences of clientelism. They often go in two directions: some studies investigate individuals in order to understand how clientelistic practices shape attitudes and behaviors, while other works focus on institutions and societies (Kitschelt and Wilkinson, 2007;Stokes et al, 2013;Braidwood, 2015;Bøggild, 2016;Bøggild and Laustsen, 2016;Corstange, 2018;Nichter, 2018;Nemčok et al, 2020;Tóth, Nemčok and Spáč, 2020;Gherghina, Saikkonen and Bankov, 2021).…”
Section: Studying Electoral Clientelismmentioning
confidence: 99%