1976
DOI: 10.1063/1.3023907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic Excitation: Theory of Coulomb Excitation with Heavy Ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
105
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data were compared with semiclassical and coupled-channels calculations. The semiclassical calculations, based on the first-order Coulomb theory of Alder and Winther [98] (which gives a breakup probability for a pure dipole excitation) underestimated the data. On the other hand, the CDCC calculation reproduced the experimental breakup cross sections quite well.…”
Section: Breakup In Thementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data were compared with semiclassical and coupled-channels calculations. The semiclassical calculations, based on the first-order Coulomb theory of Alder and Winther [98] (which gives a breakup probability for a pure dipole excitation) underestimated the data. On the other hand, the CDCC calculation reproduced the experimental breakup cross sections quite well.…”
Section: Breakup In Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The figure shows the results of semiclassical Coulomb excitation theory as described in ref. [98], where three-body theoretical (dashed line) and experimental (dot-dashed line) B(E1) distribution were used. As can be seen in the figure, the latter calculation did not reproduce the data.…”
Section: Breakup Of 11 LImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy dependence in the latter case is neglected. [4]. As can be seen, the reaction is dominated by E1 transitions from the d ground state to the p and f continua.…”
Section: Theoretical Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Second, the radiative capture being dominated by E1 transitions at stellar energies, the influence of higher multipoles of the Coulomb interaction in the breakup process must be negligible. Finally, the direct link between the Coulomb-breakup cross section and the radiative capture one can only be made at the first order of the perturbation theory [4]. The dissociation must thus occur in one step from the bound state to the continuum, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction time between the projectile and target is long enough to populate higher-lying states in multiple steps. The electromagnetic interaction can be calculated with high precision including higher-order effects, which cause a difference in the Coulomb excitation cross section for different intrinsic shapes of the nucleus [3]. If the precision of the measurement is high enough, the diagonal matrix elements (and therefore the intrinsic shapes) can be extracted from the γ-ray yields originating from the various states measured as a function of the scattering angle.…”
Section: Low-energy Coulomb Excitation Of 76 Kr and 74 Krmentioning
confidence: 99%