2006
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889806029591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ELLSTAT: shape modeling for solution small-angle scattering of proteins and protein complexes with automated statistical characterization

Abstract: A method is presented for constructing one-and two-ellipsoid, core-shellellipsoid, cylinder and ellipsoid-plus-cylinder models from small-angle X-ray and neutron scattering data that calculates statistics on the resulting structural parameters. The method, implemented in the software ELLSTAT, is capable of simultaneously fitting against several data sets and calculates averages, standard deviations and coefficients of linear correlation between the structural parameters of the resulting models. In this way, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, each model is tested relative to models generated with the same number of free parameters, so the relative comparisons are not affected. In order to judge the range of structures that fit the experimental data collected for (UreABC-UreD) 3 and (UreABC-UreDF) 3 , the best 25 models found were maintained in an ordered list that was updated as better models were found, in a manner similar to previous work [43], making it possible to judge the reproducibility of the modeling. The uncertainties in measured SAXS intensities derive from specific assumptions about the counting statistics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, each model is tested relative to models generated with the same number of free parameters, so the relative comparisons are not affected. In order to judge the range of structures that fit the experimental data collected for (UreABC-UreD) 3 and (UreABC-UreDF) 3 , the best 25 models found were maintained in an ordered list that was updated as better models were found, in a manner similar to previous work [43], making it possible to judge the reproducibility of the modeling. The uncertainties in measured SAXS intensities derive from specific assumptions about the counting statistics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models were checked for structural overlap of the various substructures, and those having too many unfavorable collisions were not tested against the SANS data using ORNL_SAS. A continuously updated set of the 25 best models found was output by the program to provide a measure of the variability of the range of models found that fit the data, as employed previously (39). Three independent runs of the modeling were performed, providing a set of 75 models for judging the variability and convergence of the modeling results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(13,14). The scattering intensities in the contrast series were then calculated from the model using equation 4 and compared to the entire contrast variation series of data simultaneously using the reduced 2 , as described previously (11,37). To efficiently search the potential parameter space, a Monte Carlo search was employed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over 15 million models were tested during the fitting of each of the pH 7.2 and pH 6.4 contrast variation series data. The variability of the results of the modeling was characterized as described previously (11).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%