2023
DOI: 10.1177/03946320231154997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encephalitis lethargica. What is still wrong?

Abstract: Encephalitis lethargica developed in epidemic from 1919 to 1926 in Europe and throughout the world. From the clinical point of view, the disturbances of consciousness and alertness and the possible outcomes of a postencephalitic Parkinsonism has attracted much attention. For a long time, it was thought that such a disease may still occur sporadically. In this review, the authors examined historical and current pictures of epidemics that may be related to Encephalitis lethargica. The previous Nona and Russian I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the early 1890 s, several cases were also reported in Switzerland of people falling into a deep sleep, sometimes lasting for days, shortly after having contracted the flu (see the section on sleeping sickness below) [ 37 ]. As this phenomenon seemed to be spreading at the same time as an epidemic in some regions of Italy (the disease was called “Nona”) [ 38 ], Swiss newspapers feared that Switzerland might also be affected by this next epidemic (which apparently did not happen to the same extent) ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early 1890 s, several cases were also reported in Switzerland of people falling into a deep sleep, sometimes lasting for days, shortly after having contracted the flu (see the section on sleeping sickness below) [ 37 ]. As this phenomenon seemed to be spreading at the same time as an epidemic in some regions of Italy (the disease was called “Nona”) [ 38 ], Swiss newspapers feared that Switzerland might also be affected by this next epidemic (which apparently did not happen to the same extent) ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%