2004
DOI: 10.3201/eid1010.031086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Escherichia coliand Community-acquired Gastroenteritis, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract: Atypical strains of enteropathogenic E. coli are a leading cause of gastroenteritis in Melbourne.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
110
4
13

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
110
4
13
Order By: Relevance
“…This is higher than prevalence rates mentioned in similar reports from Thailand (3.2 %) and Tanzania (4.6 %) and lower than those mentioned in reports from Vietnam (6.6 %) and Kuwait (8.4 %) (Ratchtrachenchai et al, 2004;Nguyen et al, 2005;Moyo et al, 2007; Albert et al, 2009). However, EPEC rates vary greatly among different countries (Robins-Browne et al, 2004;Al-Gallas et al, 2007), which may reflect geographical specificities and other factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is higher than prevalence rates mentioned in similar reports from Thailand (3.2 %) and Tanzania (4.6 %) and lower than those mentioned in reports from Vietnam (6.6 %) and Kuwait (8.4 %) (Ratchtrachenchai et al, 2004;Nguyen et al, 2005;Moyo et al, 2007; Albert et al, 2009). However, EPEC rates vary greatly among different countries (Robins-Browne et al, 2004;Al-Gallas et al, 2007), which may reflect geographical specificities and other factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is higher than prevalence rates mentioned in similar reports from Thailand (3.2 %) and Tanzania (4.6 %) and lower than those mentioned in reports from Vietnam (6.6 %) and Kuwait (8.4 %) (Ratchtrachenchai et al, 2004;Nguyen et al, 2005;Moyo et al, 2007; Albert et al, 2009). However, EPEC rates vary greatly among different countries (Robins-Browne et al, 2004;Al-Gallas et al, 2007), which may reflect geographical specificities and other factors.EPEC strains are classified into two types: the typical EPEC isolates, which are positive for both the eae gene and the bfp gene and mostly belong to the classical EPEC serotypes, and atypical EPEC isolates, which are only positive for the eae gene and belong to non-classical serotypes (Trabulsi et al, 2002; Albert et al, 2009). In the current study, among the 23 EPEC isolates tested, approximately 70 % were classified as atypical EPEC strains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aEPEC strains employed in the present study were isolated from diarrheal cases in independent epidemiological studies carried out in distinct periods in Brazil or Australia (31,33,37,47). The presence of several adhesin and toxin genes in these isolates has been reported before (16,45,47).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For unknown reasons, the incidence of EPEC infections in regions where they were most common has decreased significantly (38). Instead, a group of diarrheagenic E. coli strains bearing serotypes found among EPEC and non-EPEC strains and lacking the EAF has emerged as a significant cause of gastrointestinal disease (1,3,9,19,37). These strains share some of the virulence traits of typical EPEC strains but are categorically considered a new pathogroup, referred to as atypical EPEC (aEPEC) (22,46).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hoje em dia, raramente são isoladas como agentes de diarréia endêmica, havendo prevalência de sorotipos de EPEC atípica (TRABULSI;KELLER;GOMES, 2002). Estudos epidemiológicos recentes têm demonstrado que o mesmo vem ocorrendo no Brasil (FERNANDES-FILHO, 2004;GOMES et al, 2004;ROBINS-BROWNE et al, 2004;FRANZOLIN et al, 2005;BUERIS et al, 2007;ARAUJO et al, 2007) (BUERIS et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified