Fecal-oral
pathogens are transmitted through complex, environmentally
mediated pathways. Sanitation interventions that isolate human feces
from the environment may reduce transmission but have shown limited
impact on environmental contamination. We conducted a study in rural
Bangladesh to (1) quantify domestic fecal contamination in settings
with high on-site sanitation coverage; (2) determine how domestic
animals affect fecal contamination; and (3) assess how each environmental
pathway affects others. We collected water, hand rinse, food, soil,
and fly samples from 608 households. We analyzed samples with IDEXX
Quantitray for the most probable number (MPN) of E. coli. We detected E. coli in source water (25%), stored
water (77%), child hands (43%), food (58%), flies (50%), ponds (97%),
and soil (95%). Soil had >120 000 mean MPN E. coli per gram. In compounds with vs without animals, E. coli was higher by 0.54 log10 in soil, 0.40 log10 in stored water and 0.61 log10 in food (p < 0.05). E. coli in stored water and food increased
with increasing E. coli in soil, ponds, source water
and hands. We provide empirical evidence of fecal transmission in
the domestic environment despite on-site sanitation. Animal feces
contribute to fecal contamination, and fecal indicator bacteria do
not strictly indicate human fecal contamination when animals are present.