2022
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msac273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Escherichia Coli: What Is and Which Are?

Abstract: Escherichia coli have served as important model organisms for over a century—used to elucidate key aspects of genetics, evolution, molecular biology, and pathogenesis. However, defining which strains actually belong to this species is erratic and unstable due to shifts in the characters and criteria used to distinguish bacterial species. Additionally, many isolates designated as E. coli are genetically more closely related to strains of Shigella than to other E. coli, creating a situation in which the entire g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the clustering of Shigella within the E. coli species is a classic taxonomy vs . tradition issue (discussed in [ 24 ], and reanalysed in [ 25 ]). Accordingly, cutting hierarchical clusters at an ANI distance of 0.051, or a mash distance of 0.048 (the cutoffs suggested for the whole dataset when optimising for the F1 score using the cutpointr package; Fig 1 ), produced a cluster containing all E. coli genomes combined with all the genomes representing the four Shigella species in the dataset ( Fig 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the clustering of Shigella within the E. coli species is a classic taxonomy vs . tradition issue (discussed in [ 24 ], and reanalysed in [ 25 ]). Accordingly, cutting hierarchical clusters at an ANI distance of 0.051, or a mash distance of 0.048 (the cutoffs suggested for the whole dataset when optimising for the F1 score using the cutpointr package; Fig 1 ), produced a cluster containing all E. coli genomes combined with all the genomes representing the four Shigella species in the dataset ( Fig 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first glance, the empirical minimal doubling times seem superior to the predicted minimal doubling times because the prediction methods could not achieve an accuracy of 100%. As the wide-spread diversity among the strains designated one bacterial species ( 32 ), the ideal empirical data should include different parameters (e.g., minimal doubling time, optimal growth temperature, and CRISPR-Cas contents) collected from the same strain. Unfortunately, this is not always the case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analyses demonstrate that at least two of the Salmonella subspecies are valid biological species, but whether Salmonella nomenclature is altered, and subspecies designations are eliminated, lies beyond the jurisdiction of the present study. We have recently recommended the addition of a subscripted suffix (e.g., S. enterica BIO ) to indicate members of the same biological species—a practice that would not require immediate changes to existing classification systems ( 32 ). Application of a single, universal, and biologically meaningful criterion to define species is appealing because it allows direct comparisons across all lifeforms and will potentially yield new insights into the process of diversification across the tree of Life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%