2021
DOI: 10.1075/slcs.220.11fio
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Et cetera, eccetera, etc. The development of a general extender from Latin to Italian

Abstract: This paper discusses the range of functions of et cetera in Latin, as well as the multifunctionality and evolution of eccetera in Italian. Both forms pertain to the category of general extenders, i.e. markers whose main function is to ‘extend’ otherwise grammatically complete utterances. We will propose a qualitative analysis based on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the act of categorizing reality in a particular way is a potentially face-threatening act: this is why we have a number of cases where speakers do not produce a post-detailing component, in an attempt to avoid direct categorization; in these cases, speakers seem to prefer the use of vague expressions such as general extenders. Fiorentini (2018a) in fact proposes to link this "indirect" categorization to the pragmatic function of mitigation. On the other hand, we have cases, such as the ones discussed throughout this section, where the speakers do produce the post-detailing component in order to: (i) facilitate syntactic processing of a complex unit that might not be easily accessed as a list in online production, (ii) disambiguate between different possible interpretations of a list, (iii) mark the conclusion of their turn and ease turn-taking.…”
Section: Theoretical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the act of categorizing reality in a particular way is a potentially face-threatening act: this is why we have a number of cases where speakers do not produce a post-detailing component, in an attempt to avoid direct categorization; in these cases, speakers seem to prefer the use of vague expressions such as general extenders. Fiorentini (2018a) in fact proposes to link this "indirect" categorization to the pragmatic function of mitigation. On the other hand, we have cases, such as the ones discussed throughout this section, where the speakers do produce the post-detailing component in order to: (i) facilitate syntactic processing of a complex unit that might not be easily accessed as a list in online production, (ii) disambiguate between different possible interpretations of a list, (iii) mark the conclusion of their turn and ease turn-taking.…”
Section: Theoretical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%