As mixed methods research approaches become increasingly more common, it is imperative they are conducted in a thoughtful and rigorous manner to yield useful results. While researchers have begun to explore the use of various qualitative research methodologies in mixed methods research, there is a gap in literature discussing the philosophical congruence of using interpretive description in mixed method studies, and how to ensure rigor while integrating interpretive description results. Our purpose in writing this article is to discuss the issues of fit, purpose, process, context, and design when using interpretive description in mixed methods research approaches by drawing on examples from the literature. Further, we explore the contributions that interpretive description can make in a mixed methods inquiry. This article offers a first step in using a purposeful approach to mixed methods interpretive description studies to increase transparency and rigor in this relatively new methodology. K E Y W O R D S interpretive description, mixed-methods, philosophy, research methods, rigor 2 | MIXED METHODS RESEARCH 2.1 | Historical overview Mixed methods research became highly visible and recognized as an emerging approach to research design in the 1980s (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2018). In 1989, Greene et al. defined mixed methods studies as "those that include at least one quantitative method (designed to collect numbers) and one qualitative method (designed to collect Nursing Inquiry.