1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.48.581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

g-matrix calculations in finite hypernuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in the case of the OPE, in the OMEM, a weak baryon-baryon-meson (BBM) coupling is always combined with a strong BBM coupling. The strong one is determined experimentally with some help from the SU(3) symmetry, and the involving uncertainties have been copiously discussed in the literature [40][41][42][43]. It is the weak BBM couplings which could become the largest source of errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the case of the OPE, in the OMEM, a weak baryon-baryon-meson (BBM) coupling is always combined with a strong BBM coupling. The strong one is determined experimentally with some help from the SU(3) symmetry, and the involving uncertainties have been copiously discussed in the literature [40][41][42][43]. It is the weak BBM couplings which could become the largest source of errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present calculation, we use a shell model for the initial hypernucleus, where the single-particle ⌳ and N orbits are taken to be solutions of harmonicoscillator mean-field potentials with parameters (b ⌳ and b N ) adjusted to experimental separation energies and charge form factor (respectively) of the hypernucleus under study. For The strong YN interaction at short distances, absent in mean-field models, is accounted for by replacing the mean-field two-particle ⌳N wave function by a correlated [23] one obtained from a microscopic finite-nucleus G-matrix calculation [24] using the soft-core and hard-core Nijmegen models [25]. The NN wave function is obtained from the Lippmann-Schwinger (T-matrix) equation with the input of the Nijmegen soft-core potential model; details of the calculation can be found in the appendix of Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can see that the calculations are providing considerably more binding than that observed in the heavier systems. Similar calculations for model D gave underbinding for the light systems and overbinding for the heavier systems [15]. The soft core underbound all systems [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The procedure for these calculations is described in Refs. [6] and [7]. Briefly, the four-component Bethe-Goldstone equation is solved to obtain reference spectrum g-matrix elements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%