2017
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GaiaData Release 1

Abstract: Aims. The photometric validation of the Gaia DR1 release of the ESA Gaia mission is described and the quality of the data shown. Methods. This is carried out via an internal analysis of the photometry using the most constant sources. Comparisons with external photometric catalogues are also made, but are limited by the accuracies and systematics present in these catalogues. An analysis of the quoted errors is also described. Investigations of the calibration coefficients reveal some of the systematic effects t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accompanying papers provide details as follows: Carrasco et al (2016) for the detailed definition of the calibration models, Riello et al (2017) for a description of the software solutions and processing strategies, and Evans et al (2017) for an in-depth analysis of the results of the photometric processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The accompanying papers provide details as follows: Carrasco et al (2016) for the detailed definition of the calibration models, Riello et al (2017) for a description of the software solutions and processing strategies, and Evans et al (2017) for an in-depth analysis of the results of the photometric processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some calibration effects have not yet been fully understood and there seem to be some systematics at the 10 mmag level particularly around G = 11 (see Evans et al 2017). The Gaia photometric catalogue covers the entire sky, providing measurements of the average brightness of sources down to magnitude 21 (at different levels of completeness at this stage) in a single photometric system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations