In this guest editorial, we problematize the terms Latiné, Latinx, Latina, Latino, and Hispanic used to describe people with Latin American ancestry in the United States to better inform engineering education scholarship and practice. As members of communities that have been classified as Latiné/x/a/o or Hispanic, we are always challenged with the questions: What term should be used in our research, and why? As scholars who are also members of these communities, we bridge the contradictions emerging from our lived experiences and imposed realities while seeking to engage in a critical conversation emerging from our "theory in the flesh" (Moraga & Anzaldua, 1981). While we situate the terms historically in this guest editorial, as an act of resistance, our title places the most recent term (Latiné) first to continue to challenge historical terminologies that demoralize and oppress our communities (Revelo et al., 2022). At the same time, we recognize that for some cultures, choosing to identify by one term over another has real-life implications and consequences, such as being the targets of discrimination and oppression and being seen as transgressors (Mejia et al., 2022), or being perceived as insiders or outsiders.
| OVERVIEW OF THE PROBLEMATIC TERM " HISPANIC"Soon after the 1924 Immigration Act (The Johnson-Reed Act; U.S. Department of State, n.d.), people of Latin American descent who migrated to the United States were allowed to do so on the condition that they could contribute to the expansion of the economy while providing cheap labor (Molina, 2010). In 1930, the U.S. Census Bureau changed its policy to re-classify "Mexicans" from "non-White" to "White" (Molina, 2010). By the 1950s and 1960s, Latin American immigrants in the United States were primarily composed of Mexican, Cuban, and Puerto Rican groups. Many of them were labeled by the US government as "Whites" or via the catchall classification of "Mexican" (Bravo, n.d.). The latter classification catalyzed actions from different governmental offices, including the decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Services to dictate that a person of "Mexican" descent was required to use a form, card, or equivalent document to identify their race as "White" (Molina, 2010). This led to discrimination in communities where, for example, "Mexicans" classified as Whites were segregated de facto in schools supported by de jure policies. While these policies were aimed at those classified as "Whites" and legally supported the integration of most from Latin America, in practice, these same immigrants were socially recognized as "Brown" (Donato & Hanson, 2012).During the civil rights movement of the 1960s, leaders of Mexican-American voluntary advocacy groups (e.g., National Council of La Raza; G omez, 1992) began to call for more nuanced statistical reporting of Latin American communities in the United States, as they claimed that in addition to classifying Latin American communities as "White," existing census procedures also clustered "Spanish surnames" (Bravo, n...