2009
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1493-09.2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

I Heard That Coming: Event-Related Potential Evidence for Stimulus-Driven Prediction in the Auditory System

Abstract: The auditory system has been shown to detect predictability in a tone sequence, but does it use the extracted regularities for actually predicting the continuation of the sequence? The present study sought to find evidence for the generation of such predictions. Predictability was manipulated in an isochronous series of tones in which every other tone was a repetition of its predecessor. The existence of predictions was probed by occasionally omitting either the first (unpredictable) or the second (predictable… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
160
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
13
160
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Neural adaptation as an account for boys' rule learning in our paradigm is plausible if the auditory system works in a predictive manner, with the final syllable receiving preactivation before its occurrence. Although we cannot prove this within our study, there is independent evidence that prediction occurs in auditory sequence processing (31). With respect to our data, this finding would imply that boys' rule learning is indicated by an enhanced neural response to the nonpredicted syllable at a precognitive level, but girls' rule learning takes place at a more cognitive, memory-based level.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Neural adaptation as an account for boys' rule learning in our paradigm is plausible if the auditory system works in a predictive manner, with the final syllable receiving preactivation before its occurrence. Although we cannot prove this within our study, there is independent evidence that prediction occurs in auditory sequence processing (31). With respect to our data, this finding would imply that boys' rule learning is indicated by an enhanced neural response to the nonpredicted syllable at a precognitive level, but girls' rule learning takes place at a more cognitive, memory-based level.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Evidence from numerous electrophysiological studies (for review, see Bendixen et al [27]) suggests that these types of predictive relations can be extracted from sound sequences outside the focus of attention and that the extracted information is turned into predictions about forthcoming stimuli. For instance, Bendixen et al [28] compared the processing of sound omissions in three different cases: (i) the auditory features of the omitted sound could be predicted based on the preceding sounds, (ii) sound features could be determined only from the sound following the omitted one, and (iii) sound features could neither be predicted before nor determined after the omission. Participants' attention was engaged by watching a movie, and they received no information about the sound sequences.…”
Section: The Nature Of the Representations Underlying Sequential Groumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After an explosion of work on this topic across the last decade, predictive processes have now been repeatedly demonstrated across domains such as visual and auditory perception (Bar, 2007;Bendixen, Schroger, & Winkler, 2009), motor planning (Wolpert, 1997), and language comprehension (e.g., Delong, Urbach, & Kutas, 2005;Van Berkum, Brown, Zwitserlood, Kooijman, & Hagoort, 2005;Wicha, Moreno, & Kutas, 2004). Just as a tennis player's ability to anticipate a flying ball's trajectory is critical to his/her chances of hitting the ball, the ability to anticipate properties of upcoming input ahead of time is likely key to the efficiency with which the brain processes information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%