1998
DOI: 10.1080/00275514.1998.12026914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heliocephala zimbabweensis sp. nov. from southern Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Heliocephala zimbabweensis resembles H. proliferans, and both differ from H. variabilis by having longer conidiophores (up to 210 µm in H. proliferans; up to 240 µm in H. zimbabweensis) and two-septate conidia with a very long and filiform rostrum, subsequently showing much longer conidia (10-200 µm in H. proliferans; 23-125 µm in H. zimbabweensis) than the species proposed here. Another feature exclusive to H. proliferans and H. zimbabweensis is the presence of a secondary cluster of conidiogenous cells at the apex of the conidial rostrum [8,29]. The great morphological similarity of these two species suggest they could be conspecific, but the lack of DNA data from the type is a handicap to elucidating the taxonomy of these fungi.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heliocephala zimbabweensis resembles H. proliferans, and both differ from H. variabilis by having longer conidiophores (up to 210 µm in H. proliferans; up to 240 µm in H. zimbabweensis) and two-septate conidia with a very long and filiform rostrum, subsequently showing much longer conidia (10-200 µm in H. proliferans; 23-125 µm in H. zimbabweensis) than the species proposed here. Another feature exclusive to H. proliferans and H. zimbabweensis is the presence of a secondary cluster of conidiogenous cells at the apex of the conidial rostrum [8,29]. The great morphological similarity of these two species suggest they could be conspecific, but the lack of DNA data from the type is a handicap to elucidating the taxonomy of these fungi.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As dimensões dos caracteres taxonômicos estão incluídas dentro dos limites da variação morfológica da espécie (Ellis 1971, Hughes 1949, Matsushima 1981, 1987 (Rao et al 1984) pela presença de rostro curvo e conídio liso, respectivamente. O comprimento do conidióforo do material examinado pode alcançar dimensão superior a do conidióforo do espécime-tipo (Decock et al 1998). A espécie é referida pela segunda vez para a ciência.…”
Section: Falcocladium Sphaeropedunculatumunclassified
“…Os estudos dos fungos conidiais que atuam na decomposição de folhas no Brasil foram iniciados por Sutton & Hodges Jr. (1975a;1976a;c;1977;1978) e Sutton (1975;1977) que descreveram a partir do folhedo de Eucalyptus spp. novas espécies e novas ocorrências para o país.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified