2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2010.01029.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Silico Exploration for Identifying Structure–Activity Relationship of MEK Inhibition and Oral Bioavailability for Isothiazole Derivatives

Abstract: In this study, quantitative structure-activity ⁄ property models are developed for modeling and predicting both MEK inhibitory activity and oral bioavailability of novel isothiazole-4-carboxamidines. The models developed are thoroughly discussed to identify the key components that influence the inhibitory activity and oral bioavailability of the selected compounds. These selected descriptors serve as a first guideline for the design of novel and potent MEK inhibitors with desired ADME properties.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Details on the domain of applicability calculation are given in the literature. [5257] To implement the domain of applicability calculation, we used the Enalos Domain–Similarity node.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details on the domain of applicability calculation are given in the literature. [5257] To implement the domain of applicability calculation, we used the Enalos Domain–Similarity node.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 QSPR models were developed for modeling and predicting both MEK inhibitory activity and oral bioavailability of novel isothiazole-4-carboxamidines. 60 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many approaches were proposed to estimate AD, for instance based on descriptor ranges, Euclidean distance or probability density, each having their pros and cons. In this study, we implemented the Euclidean distance approach using the KNIME [73] node APD [74, 75] to evaluate if the test sets are within the AD of the training set.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%