2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/192452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Silico Identification of Potent PPAR‐γ Agonists from Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Bioactivity Prediction, Virtual Screening, and Molecular Dynamics Study

Abstract: The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) related to regulation of lipid metabolism, inflammation, cell proliferation, differentiation, and glucose homeostasis by controlling the related ligand-dependent transcription of networks of genes. They are used to be served as therapeutic targets against metabolic disorder, such as obesity, dyslipidemia, and diabetes; especially, PPAR-γ is the most extensively investigated isoform for the treatment of dyslipidemic type 2 diabetes. In this study, we filte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in Table 2 the control compound (T2384) has a very high dock score (77.615) and thus has a very high predictive activity from the different ligand-based methods, including multiple linear regression (MLR) [45], support vector machine (SVM) [46], and Bayesian network toolbox (BNT) [47]. However, the other compounds also have a very high predicted activity but a very low dock score [48]. From Table 2, the docking results show that the control compound (D71904) with the lowest binding energy has a low predicted activity from the ligand-based prediction (MLR and SVM).…”
Section: Trends In Pharmacological Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in Table 2 the control compound (T2384) has a very high dock score (77.615) and thus has a very high predictive activity from the different ligand-based methods, including multiple linear regression (MLR) [45], support vector machine (SVM) [46], and Bayesian network toolbox (BNT) [47]. However, the other compounds also have a very high predicted activity but a very low dock score [48]. From Table 2, the docking results show that the control compound (D71904) with the lowest binding energy has a low predicted activity from the ligand-based prediction (MLR and SVM).…”
Section: Trends In Pharmacological Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar binding mode was observed in molecular docking results [42] . The pi interactions with Phe 264, Phe 363 and h bond with Leu 340, Tyr 473. in silico identi cation of PPAR γ agonist from Chinese medicine showed similar interactions as H bond with residue Tyr 327, Lys 367 etc [50] . Quantitative parameters such as RMSD showed structural stability of the protein ligand complex.…”
Section: Principal Component Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Screening the TCM database containing more than 30 000 candidates, two TCM compounds, (S)‐tryptophan‐betaxanthin and berberrubine, have been identified as potential lead compounds targeting more than one PPAR (Chen et al ., ). By in silico identification, two other TCM candidates, 5‐hydroxy‐L‐tryptophan and abrine, were found to bind to PPARγ (Chen and Chen, ). In addition, honokiol from TCM Magnolia bark was also in silico predicted to bind to the ligand‐binding domain of PPARγ and prevent ed hyperglycaemia in diabetic mice (Atanasov et al ., ).…”
Section: Traditional Chinese Compounds Acting As Ppar Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 99%