The purpose of this Reply is to account for the possible reasons for the difference in catalytic performance of ZnCeZrO x /H-SAPO-34 composites prepared by Loridant et al. and our group. Loridant et al. assumed that CO 2 formation is dominantly controlled by thermodynamics, viz., CO 2 selectivity is in the range of 42−51% regardless of sample compositions and reaction conditions. However, this assumption contradicts with many reported catalytic results that the CO 2 selectivity is less than 40% in syngas conversion to hydrocarbons, and it is highly dependent on the structure, chemical compositions, elemental distributions, and particle size of the metal oxide; the pore structure, crystal morphology, and acidity of the zeolite component; the distance between metal oxide and zeolite particles; and the reaction conditions. This is obviously manifested by the seriously different catalytic results obtained on Loridant's and our ZnCeZrO x /H-SAPO-34 composites; Loridant's samples show far higher selectivity to CH 4 and CO 2 but lower selectivity to C 2 = -C 4 = and lower O/P ratio than our samples. This is because Loridant's and our samples have significantly different metal oxide crystalline structure, particle size, and elemental distributions as well as zeolite acidity that determines MTO and further CO-to-olefins catalytic performance.