2019
DOI: 10.1039/c8nj06134c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ growth of CuS decorated graphene oxide-multiwalled carbon nanotubes for ultrasensitive H2O2 detection in alkaline solution

Abstract: A novel hybrid nanomaterial composed of nanoparticles, nanotubes and nanosheets for electrochemical H2O2 detection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 (d) displays a plot of glucose concentration (mM) and anodic current (Ip). A linear regression line with Ip (μA) = 27.3x + 76.5 (R 2 = 0.9804), reveals that a diffusion-controlled reaction occurred on the Cu@Pani/MoS 2 electrode surface [ 90 , 91 ]. MoS 2 nano structure improves the electrocatalytic activity because of its high surface area, electron transfer abilities and rapid diffusion of the electrons and ions on the electrode surface, providing active sites for the electrocatalytic reactions during electrochemical glucose oxidation [ 92 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 (d) displays a plot of glucose concentration (mM) and anodic current (Ip). A linear regression line with Ip (μA) = 27.3x + 76.5 (R 2 = 0.9804), reveals that a diffusion-controlled reaction occurred on the Cu@Pani/MoS 2 electrode surface [ 90 , 91 ]. MoS 2 nano structure improves the electrocatalytic activity because of its high surface area, electron transfer abilities and rapid diffusion of the electrons and ions on the electrode surface, providing active sites for the electrocatalytic reactions during electrochemical glucose oxidation [ 92 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 also compares the response of non‐enzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensors based on other hybrid materials. Among them, our sensor presents a very competitive performance with lower detection limit than most of them [36–38, 42–44, 48, 56–58], comparable to [39, 40, 45, 46, 50–52] and higher than [15, 41, 47, 53–55]. In general, the sensors that present better detection limits than our sensor, are built with several constituents that can make the preparation of the sensor more time consuming, like MWCNTs dispersed in avidin and Ru [15], GO, Fe 3 O 4 , PAMAM and Pd [41], Ag@Cu 2 O and N‐rGO [47], Pt nanoparticles and polyazure A [53], three‐dimensional CuO inverse opals coated with NiO nanoflowers [54] or Au and Ag nanoparticles in connection with a potential of −0.700 V [55].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporation of carbonaceous matter enhanced the passage of large fungicide molecule across the membrane. The superior electrical conductivity, high surface area and great stability of graphene oxide nanoparticles (GO) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (CNTs), explained their role in enhancing the sensors sensitivity [23]. On the other side, graphene quantum dots (GQDs) were more preferred in electrochemical biosensing due to their intrinsic low toxicity, high solubility in many solvents, excellent electronic properties, robust chemical inertness, large speci c surface area, abundant edge sites for functionalization, great biocompatibility, low cost, and versatility [24].…”
Section: Sensor Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%