2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8nr01227j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ insight into the unconventional ruthenium catalyzed growth of carbon nanostructures

Abstract: We report on the in situ analysis of the growth process of carbon nanostructures catalyzed by Ru nanoparticles using syngas, a mixture of hydrogen and CO, as the carbon source at a medium temperature (500 °C).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Picher and Lin et al reported that orthorhombic Co 2 C was the active phase, and structural fluctuations between orthorhombic Co 2 C and Co were observed. , Zhang et al reported that CNTs grew from a cobalt carbide phase (Co 3 C or Co 2 C) . Different from the low-pressure ETEM system, windowed environmental cells (E-cells) enable in situ TEM investigations of CNT growth under atmospheric pressure. More recently, Dembélé et al reported the growth of CNTs from Co–Pt catalyst under atmospheric pressure using an E-cell, where all metallic Co and carbide phases (Co 3 C and Co 2 C) were observed to coexist . This inconsistency on the phase structure of a Co catalyst for CNT growth calls for a systematic, thorough, and convincing investigation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Picher and Lin et al reported that orthorhombic Co 2 C was the active phase, and structural fluctuations between orthorhombic Co 2 C and Co were observed. , Zhang et al reported that CNTs grew from a cobalt carbide phase (Co 3 C or Co 2 C) . Different from the low-pressure ETEM system, windowed environmental cells (E-cells) enable in situ TEM investigations of CNT growth under atmospheric pressure. More recently, Dembélé et al reported the growth of CNTs from Co–Pt catalyst under atmospheric pressure using an E-cell, where all metallic Co and carbide phases (Co 3 C and Co 2 C) were observed to coexist . This inconsistency on the phase structure of a Co catalyst for CNT growth calls for a systematic, thorough, and convincing investigation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, we succeeded in observing the early-stage evolution of oligomers from ∼5 nm in diameter in bulk solution using a liquid-state transmission electron microscopy (TEM) method, 27 which allows for the observation of the dynamics of nanoscale materials in bulk solutions, such as the aggregation of protein molecules 28,29 and the growth of carbon nanostructures. 30 Furthermore, the liquid-state TEM system allows acquisition not only of time-resolved nanoscale images, but also of electron diffraction (ED) patterns, providing structural information even of sub-ten-nanometer aggregates. It should be furthermore noted that the observation is achieved with a label-free manner without any fluorescence molecules; they affect the aggregation reaction, 31,32 preventing us from grasping the truth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, applications focus on the morphological and structural evolution of catalysts under reactive conditions that mimic gas compositions, pressure and temperatures relevant to the water gas shift [96], ethylene hydrogenation [94], CO 2 reduction [97] and CO oxidation [23,24,[98][99][100][101] reactions. Nanoreactors have also been used to investigate the catalyzed growth of materials such as carbon nanostructures [102,103] and the occurrence of strong metal-support interactions (SMSI) [77,104]. Examples of in situ TEM results acquired with gas cell TEM holders are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Gas Cells-on the Relevance Of In Situ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%