2001
DOI: 10.1063/1.1418444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ magnetoelastic coupling and stress-evolution studies of epitaxial Co35Pd65 alloy films in the monolayer regime

Abstract: We report in situ measurements of magnetoelastic coupling, B 2 , and stress, , in Co 35 Pd 65 alloy films epitaxially grown on a Cu/Si͑001͒ substrate in a thickness range of 1-10 ML by means of a highly sensitive optical deflection-detecting system. It was found that the value of B 2 increases from 0.72ϫ10 7 J/m 3 at 2 ML to 3.31ϫ10 7 J/m 3 at 10 ML. A second-order strain correction of B 2 ϭB b ϩC 1 ⑀ϩC 2 ⑀ 2 rather than a first-order one of B 2 ϭB b ϩC 1 ⑀ provides a better fit for the observed behavior of B … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies on magnetoelastic coupling (MEC) of ultrathin films show that the MEC of ultrathin films could be drastically changed at the film interface compared to the bulk one. Thus, in addition to the bulk MEC, interface alloy formation or the existence of strain due to the lattice mismatch at the interface is generally introduced to explain the behavior of MEC near the film interface or surface [1,2]. However, it is still unclear as to which mechanism plays a key role in the MEC of ultrathin ferromagnetic films.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent studies on magnetoelastic coupling (MEC) of ultrathin films show that the MEC of ultrathin films could be drastically changed at the film interface compared to the bulk one. Thus, in addition to the bulk MEC, interface alloy formation or the existence of strain due to the lattice mismatch at the interface is generally introduced to explain the behavior of MEC near the film interface or surface [1,2]. However, it is still unclear as to which mechanism plays a key role in the MEC of ultrathin ferromagnetic films.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1(a) shows an enlarged plot for the stress evolution in the sixth Pd sublayer. Note that the stress evolutions in Pd sublayers show typical coherentto-incoherent transition caused from lattice mismatch between Pd and Co [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the important issues in the area of ultrathin ferromagnetic films is their magnetoelastic property, since the magnetoelastic property could provide a new way to control the spin orientation and to enhance new magnetic anisotropy in magnetic devices [4][5][6]. Recent studies on magnetoelastic coupling (MEC) of ultrathin films show that MEC of ultrathin films can be drastically changed at the film interface compared to the bulk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Details of the measurement system are reported elsewhere [15,16]. The level of growth stress was determined from the change in curvature (R) of the substrate using the following equations [17]: (1) where Y s , ν s , and t s are Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio, and substrate thickness, respectively, and t f is the film thickness.…”
Section: −7mentioning
confidence: 99%