2012
DOI: 10.1021/la301136w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Molecular Spectroscopic Evidence for CO2 Intercalation into Montmorillonite in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide

Abstract: The interaction of anhydrous supercritical CO(2) (scCO(2)) with both kaolinite and ~1W (i.e., close to but less than one layer of hydration) calcium-saturated montmorillonite was investigated under conditions relevant to geologic carbon sequestration (50 °C and 90 bar). The CO(2) molecular environment was probed in situ using a combination of three novel high-pressure techniques: X-ray diffraction, magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and attenuated total reflection infrared spectrosco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

42
182
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
42
182
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, they found that CO 2 intercalation into dehydrated smectite results in layer expansion, with d 001 value expanding from 10.0 Å to 12.3 Å for Na + -Mt clay mineral exposed to 700 Torr CO 2 at −48°C. This latter result has been demonstrated at PT conditions relevant to CCUS with direct evidence by Rother et al (2013) based on neutron diffraction analyses and by Loring et al (2012) using XRD, MAS NMR, and in situ high pressure ATR-IR on ion-exchanged versions of Mt STx-1 with less than one monolayer of hydration in the interlayer space. Rother et al (2013) used a sodium-exchanged sample (Na + -STx-1) and Loring et al (2012) used a calcium exchanged sample (Ca ++ -STx-1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Further, they found that CO 2 intercalation into dehydrated smectite results in layer expansion, with d 001 value expanding from 10.0 Å to 12.3 Å for Na + -Mt clay mineral exposed to 700 Torr CO 2 at −48°C. This latter result has been demonstrated at PT conditions relevant to CCUS with direct evidence by Rother et al (2013) based on neutron diffraction analyses and by Loring et al (2012) using XRD, MAS NMR, and in situ high pressure ATR-IR on ion-exchanged versions of Mt STx-1 with less than one monolayer of hydration in the interlayer space. Rother et al (2013) used a sodium-exchanged sample (Na + -STx-1) and Loring et al (2012) used a calcium exchanged sample (Ca ++ -STx-1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This latter result has been demonstrated at PT conditions relevant to CCUS with direct evidence by Rother et al (2013) based on neutron diffraction analyses and by Loring et al (2012) using XRD, MAS NMR, and in situ high pressure ATR-IR on ion-exchanged versions of Mt STx-1 with less than one monolayer of hydration in the interlayer space. Rother et al (2013) used a sodium-exchanged sample (Na + -STx-1) and Loring et al (2012) used a calcium exchanged sample (Ca ++ -STx-1). Approximately 70-80% of the layer charge for STx-1 derives from the octahedral sheet, based on analysis of Mg exchange data in Van Olphen and Fripiat (1979) and Jaynes and Bigham (1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Permanent trapping of CO 2 in the interlayer of Naexchanged smectite (Na-SWy-2), potentially as carbonates, was also indicated in the work by Hur et al (2013) and Romanov (2013) from Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray diffraction data. However, CO 2 trapping in clays was not observed in a number of other studies: Krukowski et al (2015) using FTIR on Na-exchanged (Na-STx-1), and Schaef et al (2012) on Ca-exchanged (Ca-STx-1) Texasmontmorillonite using thermo gravimetric analysis, as well as Loring et al (2012), also on the same Caexchanged samples using a variety of methods, such as magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and attenuated total reflection infrared spectroscopy. These measurements were performed at 50°C and pressures up to 18 MPa.…”
Section: Co 2 Sorption On Clay Mineralsmentioning
confidence: 85%