2019
DOI: 10.1128/aac.01814-18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Clinical Isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Collected in Latin American Countries: Results from the INFORM Global Surveillance Program, 2012 to 2015

Abstract: The International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) global surveillance program collected clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (n ϭ 7,665) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n ϭ 1,794) from 26 medical centers in six Latin American countries from 2012 to 2015. The in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators was determined for the isolates using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference broth microdilution method. Enterobacteriaceae were highly susceptible (99.7… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the evaluated strains, 0.8% were resistant to MEM. Similarly, Karlowsky et al [9] evaluated the activity of CZA and comparators against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa collected between 2012 and 2015 from six Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Venezuela). In this study, CZA was active against 99.7% of 7665 Enterobacterales, which is similar to our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the evaluated strains, 0.8% were resistant to MEM. Similarly, Karlowsky et al [9] evaluated the activity of CZA and comparators against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa collected between 2012 and 2015 from six Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Venezuela). In this study, CZA was active against 99.7% of 7665 Enterobacterales, which is similar to our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…По данным мно гоцентрового эпидемиологического исследования МАРАФОН, цефтазидимавибактам по сравнению с другими антибиотиками проявлял наиболее высо кую чувствительность среди клинически значимых энтеробактерий, выделенных от больных в стациона рах России, которая составила 96,5 %, среди карба пенемазопродуцирующих бактерий, включая проду центы МБЛ, -79,6 % [12]. По результатам работ ученых из США чувствительность энтеробактерий с продук цией карбапенемаз групп KPC к цефтазидимуавибак таму составила 98,7-99,6 %, групп OXA48 -98,5-100 % [49,50]. Все штаммы энтеробактерий с продукцией OXA48 (n = 76), выделенные из гемокультуры от боль ных с опухолями системы крови в многоцентровом исследовании российских клиник, были чувствитель ными к цефтазидимуавибактаму (собственные не опубликованные данные).…”
Section: цефтазидим-авибактамunclassified
“…Furthermore, avibactam has shown a more inhibitory effect in comparison to the common β-lactamase inhibitors such as clavulanic acid, sulbactam, and tazobactam. 5 Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) is a mixture of a new cephalosporin merged with a β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor called tazobactam. Tazobactam irreversibly binds to the active site of β-lactamases and protects ceftolozane from destruction by the majority of β-lactamases such as ESBLs enzymes; however, it does not improve its activity against pathogens such as P. aeruginosa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%