Blood‐Brain Barrier in Drug Discovery 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118788523.ch10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In VitroAssays for Assessing BBB Permeability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 188 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes permeation through the BBB after, e.g., parenteral administration . Several sophisticated in vitro BBB models were developed in recent years to resemble the situation in vivo . Apart from the cellular barrier, the in vivo situation is also complicated by flow, which has been taken into consideration by some recent models . One promising approach involves models based on human induced-pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs)-derived BBB endothelial cells. , Using such a hiPSC-derived model, physiological characteristics like high transendothelial electrical resistances (TEER) up to 2500 Ω·cm 2 , distinct upregulation of typical BBB genes as well as the formation of an in vivo -like tight junction network could be achieved .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This includes permeation through the BBB after, e.g., parenteral administration . Several sophisticated in vitro BBB models were developed in recent years to resemble the situation in vivo . Apart from the cellular barrier, the in vivo situation is also complicated by flow, which has been taken into consideration by some recent models . One promising approach involves models based on human induced-pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs)-derived BBB endothelial cells. , Using such a hiPSC-derived model, physiological characteristics like high transendothelial electrical resistances (TEER) up to 2500 Ω·cm 2 , distinct upregulation of typical BBB genes as well as the formation of an in vivo -like tight junction network could be achieved .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…87 Several sophisticated in vitro BBB models were developed in recent years to resemble the situation in vivo. [88][89][90] Apart from the cellular barrier, the in vivo the situation is also complicated by flow, which has been taken into consideration by some recent models. 91 One promising approach are models based on human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) derived BBB endothelial cells.…”
Section: Atv Permeability Through Artificial Blood-brain Barriermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these calculations, analogues 16 , 20 , and 39 all are predicted to be CNS-inactive with values of −2 for each, while 38 has a predicted value of 0, indicating at least partial CNS activity. Alternatively, Madin–Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells have been shown to be a viable surrogate to assess for BBB permeability. , This is captured in the QPPMDCK apparent permeability ( P app ) metric where a predicted P app > 500 nm/s is desired for CNS activity. Analogues 16 , 20 , and 39 all had QPPMDCK P app values around 140 nm/s, which would support the reduced CNS score, while 38 was predicted to have a value of 632 nm/s (Table ), indicating that it was the most likely of the cohort to reach the desired site of action.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%