2017
DOI: 10.1128/aac.01350-17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Comparison of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam to Traditional Beta-Lactams and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam as an Alternative to Combination Antimicrobial Therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Abstract: Guidelines for the treatment of sepsis, febrile neutropenia, and hospitalacquired pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa include empirical regimens incorporating two antibiotics from different classes with activity against P. aeruginosa for select at-risk patients to increase the likelihood that the organism will be susceptible to at least one agent. The activity against P. aeruginosa and the rates of cross-resistance of ceftolozane-tazobactam were compared to those of the ␤-lactam comparators cefepime, ce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower resistance rate observed may be due to those authors' composite assessment of isolates from respiratory tract, bloodstream, urine, and skin/wound infections, compared with our assessment of respiratory tract and bloodstream isolates only. This finding highlights the significance of culture source in the interpretation of resistance patterns, as noted in several other studies (22,23).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lower resistance rate observed may be due to those authors' composite assessment of isolates from respiratory tract, bloodstream, urine, and skin/wound infections, compared with our assessment of respiratory tract and bloodstream isolates only. This finding highlights the significance of culture source in the interpretation of resistance patterns, as noted in several other studies (22,23).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Fortunately, the unmet need for safe and reliable therapies for these pathogens has seen the development and approval of several ␤-lactam combination agents (i.e., ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam). Although not included in this study, ceftolozane-tazobactam has consistently demonstrated potent in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa that is similar to if not greater than that of ceftazidime-avibactam in large surveillance studies (22,32,35). Importantly, the addition of tazobactam does little to enhance the activity of ceftolozane against P. aeruginosa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Other studies have reported other drugs to be active against CRAB 19,20 and several new drugs have been introduced in the real world with effects against MDR or XDR gram-negative bacteria. 21,22 Whether combination therapy with newer antibiotic agents (such as ceftolozanetazobactam or ceftazidime-avibactam) or other agents are useful options in this clinical context remains unknown and conclusions on the efficacy of combination therapy for these infections should not be drawn from the results of this trial before evaluation of newer drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, C/T was noninferior to levofloxacin for the treatment of cUTIs, including pyelonephritis (4), which was mainly attributable to high rates of levofloxacin-resistant isolates among cUTI-causing bacteria (5,6). In vitro, C/T inhibits the growth of a high percentage of bacterial isolates from the medically important Enterobacteriaceae family and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, outperforming several current first-line antibiotics for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms (3,(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Nevertheless, resistance to C/T has been observed, emphasizing the need for C/T susceptibility testing in clinical microbiology laboratories (15)(16)(17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%