2013
DOI: 10.5504/bbeq.2012.0087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In VitroMicrografting of the Almond Cultivars “Texas”, “Ferrastar” and “Nonpareil”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New root development was not observed in male micrografts when proliferation medium was used, but 20% of female micrografts developed further roots. Several researchers reported that the composition of the medium was one of the important factors for micrografting success of almond cultivars (Fotopoulos and Sotiropoulos, 2005;Yıldırım et al, 2010Yıldırım et al, , 2013 and of pistachio (Onay et al, 2003a(Onay et al, , 2004. Similarly, in this study significant differences were reported in the mean rates of micrografting success, as well as in axillary shoot and root development in both genotypes for the three types of media tested.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…New root development was not observed in male micrografts when proliferation medium was used, but 20% of female micrografts developed further roots. Several researchers reported that the composition of the medium was one of the important factors for micrografting success of almond cultivars (Fotopoulos and Sotiropoulos, 2005;Yıldırım et al, 2010Yıldırım et al, , 2013 and of pistachio (Onay et al, 2003a(Onay et al, , 2004. Similarly, in this study significant differences were reported in the mean rates of micrografting success, as well as in axillary shoot and root development in both genotypes for the three types of media tested.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…On account of the results of previously reported micrografting methods concerning almond (Yıldırım et al, 2013) and pistachio (Onay et al, 2004), slit micrografting was used in this study. Three different culture media were tested for optimum micrograft development: 1) MS medium containing 30 g/L sucrose and 6.7 g/L agar; 2) shoot proliferation MS medium containing 30 g/L sucrose, 1.0 mg/L BA, and 7 g/L agar; 3) rooting MS medium containing 30 g/L sucrose, 1.0 mg/L indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), and 6.7 g/L agar.…”
Section: Effects Of Medium Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micrografting involves in vitro placing of shoot tip as an explant on a decapitated rootstock grown from a seed ( Hussain et al, 2014 ). Micrografting protocols have been developed for many fruit crops including grapes ( Aazami and Bagher, 2010 ), walnut ( Wang et al, 2010 ), almond ( Yıldırım et al, 2013 ), etc. Rafail and Mosleh (2010) reported that in in vitro grafting of apple and pear, homografting was relatively more successful compared to heterografting and an increase in micrograft success was noticed from 30 to 90% in pear (cv.…”
Section: Grafting Techniques In Fruit Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another drawback of the research conducted on micrografting processes refers to the use of seedling rootstocks. In fruit trees micrografting most authors used seedling rootstocks produced in vivo: Abousalim and Mantell [30] and Onay et al [31] with pistachio, Fengtong et al [32] with mulberry or in vitro, Yildirim et al [33,34] with almond, Naz et al [35] with citrus, and Hassanen [36] with pear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%