2019
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Study of the Anti-cancer Effect of Alternate-day 5-Fluorouracil in Head and Neck Cancer Cells

Abstract: Background/Aim: We have previously reported that alternate-day S-1 had comparable effects and milder adverse events than the respective consecutive-day regimen in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the anticancer effects of both regimens and underlying mechanisms in vitro. Materials and Methods: Two head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines were treated with 5-FU given on an alternate-day or consecutive-day schedule. The relative inhibition (RI) of tumo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five days after irradiation some DjPiwiA -positive cells are still detectable in planarian body region unrelated to the DMC (figure 1 d ). Strikingly, DCM cells are resistant to the treatment with high doses of the genotoxicant 5-fluorouracyl (5FU) (5FU CT6000) [35,36] that specifically affect cells during their transit through the S phase of the cell cycle [37], thus suggesting that DMC cells are someway arrested or cycle at a very slow rate (figure 1 d ). Another scenario in which DMC cells show higher resistance with respect to dispersed neoblasts is following the silencing of the prohibitin 2 homologue DjPhb2 [38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five days after irradiation some DjPiwiA -positive cells are still detectable in planarian body region unrelated to the DMC (figure 1 d ). Strikingly, DCM cells are resistant to the treatment with high doses of the genotoxicant 5-fluorouracyl (5FU) (5FU CT6000) [35,36] that specifically affect cells during their transit through the S phase of the cell cycle [37], thus suggesting that DMC cells are someway arrested or cycle at a very slow rate (figure 1 d ). Another scenario in which DMC cells show higher resistance with respect to dispersed neoblasts is following the silencing of the prohibitin 2 homologue DjPhb2 [38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this point, the still high dUTP/dTTP ratio most probably leads to frequent miss-incorporation of dUTP into the de-novo-synthesized DNA strand [33]. According to the literature, nucleotide unbalance and miss-incorporation produce a condition in which the replication fork progression slows down, producing fork pausing and instability, which, in turn, trigger an S-phase arrest [34] and unfinished DNA replication, thus activating a DNA damage response to avoid entry into mitosis with under-replicated or damaged chromosomes [35]. Indeed, following a massive S-phase entrance, the number of planarian mitotic cells remains low, leading us to hypothesize that the majority of stem cells remain blocked in the S phase of the cell cycle, following SDT-600 treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since outcome of patients with locally advanced SCCHN require improvement, many preclinical and clinical studies have been conducted during recent years (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). The prognoses of patients with SCCHN are particularly poor, if unresectable or incompletely resected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%