Daily administration (q24h) of raltegravir has been shown to be as efficacious as twice-daily administration (q12h) in the hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM) system. However, q24h regimens were not noninferior to q12h dosing in a clinical trial. We hypothesized that between-patient variability in raltegravir pharmacokinetics (PK) was responsible for the discordance in conclusions between the in vitro and in vivo studies. Hollow-fiber cartridges were inoculated with HIV-infected H9 cells and uninfected CEM-SS cells. Four cartridges received the total daily exposure (800 mg) q24h and four received half the daily exposure (400 mg) q12h. PK profiles with half-lives of 8, 4, 3, and 2 h were simulated for each dosing interval. Cell-to-cell viral spread was assessed by flow cytometry. Viral inhibition was similar between q24h and q12h dosing at the 8-and 4-h half-lives. The q24h dosing was not as efficacious as the q12h dosing when faster half-lives were simulated; a lack of viral suppression was observed at days 3 and 4 for the 2-and 3-h half-lives, respectively. The discrepancy in conclusions between the in vitro HFIM system studies and clinical trials is likely due to the large interindividual variation in raltegravir PK.
Raltegravir is an HIV-1 integrase inhibitor that is used in combination with other antiretroviral agents to treat patients with HIV-1 infections. Raltegravir-based combination chemotherapeutic regimens have been shown to be well tolerated and highly efficacious in both treatment-naive (1-5) and treatment-experienced (6-8) patient populations compared to other combination regimens. Raltegravir is currently administered as a 400-mg twicedaily (BID) dose. A once-daily (QD) raltegravir regimen would be preferable in a clinical setting, since the convenience of a QD regimen would likely improve patient adherence.Previous work done by others has shown that, once bound, raltegravir remains in the active site of the HIV-1 integrase protein for a long time, demonstrating dissociative half-lives ranging from 7.3 to 8.8 h (9, 10). The long occupancy time of raltegravir in the binding pocket of viral integrase suggests that once-daily dosing (800 mg QD) may be as efficacious as the current regimen of 400 mg BID. Moreover, data generated using an in vitro pharmacodynamic (PD) hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM) system supported this speculation (11). Given the strong in vitro support of once-daily dosing, Merck conducted a phase 3 noninferiority trial to compare the efficacy of raltegravir administered as 800 mg QD to the standard dosage regimen of 400 mg BID. The findings of this clinical study showed that both regimens yielded high response rates in vivo, but once-daily dosing did not achieve the ĻŖ10% noninferiority margin and was deemed not noninferior to the twice-daily regimen (12). Our objectives for this study were to explain the discordance in conclusions between the in vitro experiments and human clinical studies for raltegravir and to identify the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) determinants ...