2020
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.210054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro-virtual-reality: an anatomically explicit musculoskeletal simulation powered by in vitro muscle using closed loop tissue-software interaction

Abstract: Muscle force-length dynamics are governed by intrinsic contractile properties, motor stimulation and mechanical load. Although intrinsic properties are well characterised, physiologists lack in vitro instrumentation to account for combined effects of limb inertia, musculoskeletal architecture and contractile dynamics. We introduce in vitro virtual reality (in vitro-VR) which enables in vitro muscle tissue to drive a musculoskeletal jumping simulation. In hardware, muscle force from a frog plantaris was transmi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given these results, it is critical that the approaches to studying isolated muscles advance beyond the standard historical protocols. While direct measures of muscle force and length in vivo may not be practical for all systems, recent technical advances provide the potential to bridge the gaps in current understanding by using real-time feedback control to allow isolated muscles to interact dynamically with models (physical or virtual) (Robertson and Sawicki, 2015; Richards and Eberhard 2020; Mendoza et al 2023). Further work and new approaches are needed to understand how the nonlinear interactions between activation and strain trajectory influence muscle force and work output during dynamic contractions in vivo .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given these results, it is critical that the approaches to studying isolated muscles advance beyond the standard historical protocols. While direct measures of muscle force and length in vivo may not be practical for all systems, recent technical advances provide the potential to bridge the gaps in current understanding by using real-time feedback control to allow isolated muscles to interact dynamically with models (physical or virtual) (Robertson and Sawicki, 2015; Richards and Eberhard 2020; Mendoza et al 2023). Further work and new approaches are needed to understand how the nonlinear interactions between activation and strain trajectory influence muscle force and work output during dynamic contractions in vivo .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The muscle also has low-pass filter characteristics, making the control problem hard for classical approaches-in addition to the typical redundancy of having more muscles than DoF. In all our experiments, we use the MuJoCo internal muscle model, which approximates these characteristics and has been used for other muscle-based studies [17,11,23,24]. One limitation consists in the non-elasticity of the tendon.…”
Section: Muscle Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the highly integrated nature of these systems, we recommend performing dynamic analyses that include direct measurements of muscle properties (pennation angle, starting fiber length, ofl) and resistive forces to most accurately predict the influence of changes in lever mechanics on kinematics. There are several open source musculoskeletal modeling programs available to do this (Seth et al, 2018;Todorov et al, 2012) and published examples of in house built models or studies using opensource software abound (De Schepper et al, 2008;Farris et al, 2014;Hutchinson et al, 2015;Ilton et al, 2018;Richards and Eberhard, 2020;Roberts, 2003). See the supplemental materials for example code used in this manuscript.…”
Section: What Could Replace Quasi-static Analyses?mentioning
confidence: 99%