2015
DOI: 10.1049/htl.2015.0024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo and in situ measurement and modelling of intra‐body effective complex permittivity

Abstract: Radio frequency tracking of medical micro-robots in minimally invasive medicine is usually investigated upon the assumption that the human body is a homogeneous propagation medium. In this Letter, the authors conducted various trial programs to measure and model the effective complex permittivity e in terms of refraction e′, absorption e″ and their variations in gastrointestinal (GI) tract organs (i.e. oesophagus, stomach, small intestine and large intestine) and the porcine abdominal wall under in vivo and in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, without any apparent reason, other tissues such as esophagus and pancreas have not been measured at all above 500 MHz. In addition, there is a heterogeneity regarding the animal species chosen for characterization: there are works performed on cats [14], dogs [13], frogs [11], humans [7], mice [21], pigs [22], rats [16], and sheep [10], among others. This can lead to inconsistencies when comparing analogous or different tissues from different species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, without any apparent reason, other tissues such as esophagus and pancreas have not been measured at all above 500 MHz. In addition, there is a heterogeneity regarding the animal species chosen for characterization: there are works performed on cats [14], dogs [13], frogs [11], humans [7], mice [21], pigs [22], rats [16], and sheep [10], among others. This can lead to inconsistencies when comparing analogous or different tissues from different species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, there are some recent studies assessing the dielectric properties in in vivo conditions, although the number of available tissues is more limited. Such in vivo studies have reported measurements on cats [53], [73], rats [73], frogs [62], swine [74], [75], sheep [76], mice [77] and humans [78], [79]. By analyzing the different contributions that contain UWB data, it can be easily observed that the dielectric constant is larger for high water-content tissues like muscle than for low water-content ones such as bones, as one can observe in Fig.…”
Section: Characterization Of Body Tissuesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Antennas on skin are affected (gain, impedance, etc) by the dielectric properties of the skin. Several measurements of the dielectric properties of porcine skin have reported similarities to human skin [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%