is also an important source of several metabolic signals. As an integral part of the glycerolipid/fatty acid cycle ( 1 ), lipolysis produces lipid signals that modify cellular functions such as glucose-stimulated insulin secretion ( 2 ) and metabolic pathways and also alter transcription of various genes ( 1, 3 ). TG breakdown to glycerol and fatty acids is accomplished by the sequential action of adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL), which hydrolyzes TG to 2,3-or 1,3-diacylglycerol (DAG), followed by hormone sensitive lipase (HSL)-mediated DAG hydrolysis to generate 1-or 2-monoacylglycerol (MAG) ( 1, 3 ). Finally MAG is hydrolyzed by either the classical MAG lipase (MAGL) or the recently described ␣ /  -hydrolase domain 6 (ABHD6) to glycerol and FFA ( 4-6 ). Receptor-mediated signaling at the plasma membrane leads to the phospholipase-C-dependent formation of 1,2-DAG, which is further hydrolyzed by sn -1-DAG lipases (DAGL) ␣ or  ( 7 ), to form mostly 2-MAG.Recent studies indicated the physiological importance of many of these lipases. Thus, ATGL has been implicated in lipid homeostasis in adipocytes, myocardium and skeletal muscle, cancer cachexia ( 1,3,8 ), and the regulation of insulin secretion in pancreatic  -cells ( 9 ). HSL was shown to be important in adipose lipid metabolism ( 10 ) and in the regulation of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion ( 11,12 ). MAGL, which hydrolyzes the endocannabinoid Abstract Lipids are used as cellular building blocks and condensed energy stores and also act as signaling molecules. The glycerolipid/ fatty acid cycle, encompassing lipolysis and lipogenesis, generates many lipid signals. Reliable procedures are not available for measuring activities of several lipolytic enzymes for the purposes of drug screening, and this resulted in questionable selectivity of various known lipase inhibitors. We now describe simple assays for lipolytic enzymes, including adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL), hormone sensitive lipase (HSL), sn -1-diacylglycerol lipase (DAGL), monoacylglycerol lipase, ␣ /  -hydrolase domain 6, and carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) using recombinant human and mouse enzymes either in cell extracts or using purifi ed enzymes. We observed that many of the reported inhibitors lack specifi city. Thus, Cay10499 (HSL inhibitor) and RHC20867 (DAGL inhibitor) also inhibit other lipases. Marked differences in the inhibitor sensitivities of human ATGL and HSL compared with the corresponding mouse enzymes was noticed. Thus, ATGListatin inhibited mouse ATGL but not human ATGL, and the HSL inhibitors WWL11 and Compound 13f were effective against mouse enzyme but much less potent against human enzyme. Many of these lipase inhibitors also inhibited human CES1. Results describe reliable assays for measuring lipase activities that are amenable for drug screening and also caution about the specifi city of the many earlier described lipase inhibitors.